This page hosts requests for global permissions. To make a request, read the relevant policy (global rollback, global sysop, ...) and make a request below. Explain why membership is needed for that group, and detail prior experience or qualifications.
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Successful global rollback requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion, while successful global sysop discussions require no fewer than 2 weeks.
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global rollback for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
|status = <!-- don't change this line -->
|domain = global <!-- don't change this line -->
|user name = Username
}}
The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.
I am Morphypnos and would like to request for Global Rollback. Here I sometimes translate ; on wikis, I am administrator of a small wiki, fr.wikiquote, local rollback, on fr.wiktionary, and reviewer on fr.wikinews and, to me, each office is a rewarding experience against the vandalism. I need global rollback tools in order to more efficiently revert vandalism, nosense and spam edits. Moreover, I am an active member of SWMT and often on #cvn-sw.
Thank you. Mɔʁfipnɔs (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Support --Wiki13talk 15:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Support - Every bit helps. Neutral wasn't needed. Southparkfan 15:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Good cross-wiki countervandalism, thanks for helping :-) Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Support fine by me. Trijnsteltalk 19:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Question: On sulutil:Morphypnos I find quite a lot unattached accounts. Are they yours? If so, are they the result of a bug? Or were they created by someone else? Is it possible to get them attached to your SUL maybe? GR won't be assigned to those unattached accounts, but nevertheless I think it's save to get this solved. Trijnsteltalk 19:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
I effectively haven't attached their accounts. I think that it's possible to attach them but I don't want it. However, if I change my opinion being GR, will I can attach them?--Mɔʁfipnɔs (talk) 21:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Please visit Special:Mergeaccount to see if that's possible (you need to know their password or the mail address must be the same, afaik). --MF-W 21:32, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
It appears that these accounts aren't mine.--Mɔʁfipnɔs (talk) 22:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Okay. — TBloeminktalk 19:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Support I don't anticipate any problems, trusted, some experience as admin and rollbacker, no reason not to support. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
It's been a while since I applied for global rollback, but I think it's about time. I'm currently active in #cvn-swconnect, reverting using undo or using a previous version and marking pages for deletion. I been doing this for a number of years now, and I think I'm more than ready the handle rollback globally. I'm an administrator on Wikidata and Commons, and a rollbacker on the English Wikipedia. Thanks. Techman224Talk 04:06, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Regretful oppose - for much of the same reasons others were opposing your steward election: lack of sufficient cross-wiki experience. Keep up the SWMT work for at least another seven months or so and you probably will escape all these problems.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
I have been reverting since 2009, see my cross wiki contributions. Techman224Talk 04:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Weak support per Jasper.Support Activity levels should be okay. But please become more active though. I wish you good luck! Jianhui67talk★contribs 04:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Support I'm OK with this. Techman has been active recently, and can be trusted with the rollback bit. Ajraddatz (Talk) 04:32, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per Ajraddatz. PiRSquared17 (talk) 04:40, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Support per Ajraddatz. --Wiki13talk 16:41, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Support No big deal, and trusted. So my answer is yes. — TBloeminktalk 17:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Oppose. Per policy, you need to be "demonstrably active in cross-wiki countervandalism or anti-spam activities […] and make heavy use of revert on many wikis" before applying for this global permission and from what I have seen in your luxo your activity in the SWMT has been very volatile (activity in 2009, then nothing for years, activity at the beginning of 2012, then again nothing and now low activity since December). For example this year, you have only performed 21 reverts outside of wikis where you already have a local rollback permission assigned, which doesn't demonstrate a "heavy use of revert on many wikis" as required by the policy, in my opinion. Vogonetalk 19:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
& with regret, as this is clearly a capable vandalfighter we're talking about. However the policy requires "make heavy use of revert on many wikis" which I do not believe is currently fulfilled by Techman. I looked thru luxo and found a lot of reverts, but few that weren't either this month or before spring 2013. I examined Techman's contributions on all wikis where he's been active this year, and found significant revert activity, but localized to a couple of days in february and january, and I do not think that it raises to the level of "heavy reverts". I think a user who desires the global rollbacker flag should show significant levels of activity for more than a few days in the past year. I would happily welcome a request later down the line after the user is consistently active in global countervandalism. SnowolfHow can I help? 19:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To make a request
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain of why you need the access and why you're suitable.
=== Global sysop for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
|status = <!-- don't change this line -->
|domain = global <!-- don't change this line -->
|user name = Username
}}
The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.
Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks created via Special:GlobalBlock.
Instructions for making a request
Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:
You are logged in on this wiki, and the account is part of your global account;
To request global IP block exemption
Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why you need the access and why you're suitable. If needed, link to relevant discussions.
=== Global IP block exempt for [[User:Foo|Foo]] ===
{{sr-request
|status = <!--don't change this line-->
|domain = global<!--don't change this line-->
|user name =
|discussion=
}}
<Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~
The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a short period of consideration (typically 5 days). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential.
Support --Wiki13 talk 15:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Question: On sulutil:Morphypnos I find quite a lot unattached accounts. Are they yours? If so, are they the result of a bug? Or were they created by someone else? Is it possible to get them attached to your SUL maybe? GR won't be assigned to those unattached accounts, but nevertheless I think it's save to get this solved. Trijnsteltalk 19:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Regretful oppose - for much of the same reasons others were opposing your steward election: lack of sufficient cross-wiki experience. Keep up the SWMT work for at least another seven months or so and you probably will escape all these problems.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
