Tweets

  1. Retweeted by
    15m

    It's an estimate of what the scraper touched. Not what he copied, Not what he took with him, not what he handed to journos.

    View conversation Hide conversation
  2. Retweeted by
    1h

    I can reassure the Public that my viewing of their pornographic Yahoo Webcamming was done within a strict legal and policy framework.

    Expand Collapse
  3. 40m

    this is great - many similar points. I will add a link in to mine

    View conversation Hide conversation
  4. 45m

    ahh I see what you're saying. fair point

    View conversation Hide conversation
  5. 48m

    that's the whole point. WhatsApp has 50 engineers. TextSecure has 2.

    View conversation Hide conversation
  6. 52m

    WhatsApp vs. TextSecure: why it's vital for the public to fund open-source encryption tools.

    Expand Collapse
  7. 1h

    Yahoo on GCHQ/NSA collecting images from millions of webcams: "a whole new level of violation of our users' privacy…completely unacceptable"

    Expand Collapse
  8. Retweeted by
    1h

    OPTIC NERVE shows the insane danger of NSA cooperation w GCHQ: the Brits misuse data in ways the NSA wouldn't tolerate.

    Expand Collapse
  9. 2h

    If you haven't already ordered 's removable webcam covers, now is probably the time to do it:

    View summary Hide summary
  10. 2h

    Wow. UK's spy agency collected millions of webcam images of Yahoo users, including large quantity of sexual material

    View summary Hide summary
  11. 16h

    noooooo

    View conversation Hide conversation
  12. 18h

    1) those are the new guidelines 2) don't think they apply to NSLs 3) this NSL could've been from 7 years ago

    View conversation Hide conversation
  13. Retweeted by
    18h

    Typically clear, crisp, jargon-free analysis of FBI supposedly obtaining 's phone records.

    Expand Collapse
  14. Retweeted by
    18h

    The silver lining is that the motion for reconsideration will have the longest list of amici in the history of the 9th Circuit.

    Expand Collapse
  15. 18h

    Read 's timeline to see just how horrible today's 9th Circuit censorship ruling is for both free speech and copyright law.

    Expand Collapse
  16. 19h

    Appeals court has created "massive problems both for basic copyright law and the 1st Amendment" by censoring Youtube

    Expand Collapse
  17. 20h

    If you ever want to circumvent the First Amendment and get something censored, copyright is always your best bet.

    View summary Hide summary
  18. 20h

    There are so many things wrong with this, it's tough to fit them all in one tweet.

    View summary Hide summary
  19. 20h

    just saw. unbelievable

    View conversation Hide conversation
  20. 20h

    What? RT BREAKING: Appeals court in California orders YouTube to remove anti-Muslim film that sparked violence.

    Expand Collapse

@trevortimm hasn't tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.