Steward requests/Checkuser

Steward requests (Checkuser)

Checkuser icons
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments.
{{Confirmed}}: Confirmed	{{MoreInfo}}: Additional information needed
{{Likely}}: Likely	{{Deferred}}: Deferred to
{{Possible}}: Possible	{{Completed}}: Completed
{{Unlikely}}: Unlikely	{{TakeNote}}: Note:
{{Unrelated}}: Unrelated	{{Doing}}: Doing...
{{Inconclusive}}: Inconclusive	{{StaleIP}}: Stale
{{Declined}}: Declined	{{Fishing}}: CheckUser is not for fishing
{{Pixiedust}}: CheckUser is not magic pixie dust	{{8ball}}: The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
{{Duck}}: It looks like a duck to me	{{Crystalball}}: CheckUser is not a crystal ball

This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.

Before making a request:

Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
Make sure there are no local checkusers or policies.
- Wikimedia: meta • commons
- Wikipedia: ar • ca • cs • da • de • en • es • fi • fr • he • hr • hu • id • it • ja • ko • ml • nl • no • pl • pt • ro • ru • simple • sr • sv • th • tr • uk • vi • zh
- Wikibooks: en
- Wikinews: en
- Wikisource: en
- Wiktionary: en
Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:

How to make a request

How to make a request:

Place your request at the bottom of the section, using the template below (see also {{srcu}} help).

=== [email protected] ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = 
 |project shortcut= 
 |user name1      = 
 |user name2      = 
 |user name3      = 
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

For example:

=== [email protected] ===
{{CU request
 |status          = <!--don't change this line-->
 |language code   = en
 |project shortcut= w
 |user name1      = Example
 |user name2      = Foo
 |user name3      = Bar
<!-- Max 10 users -->
 |discussion      = [[:w:en:Example]]<!-- local confirmation link / local policy link -->
 |reason          = Reasons here. ~~~~
}}

Specify the wiki(s) you want to perform the check on.

Crosswiki requests
CheckUser information Global blocks/locks Permissions (global) Permissions (bot) Permissions (other) Username changes/ Unified login conflict resolution Miscellaneous requests URL blacklisting Title/username blacklisting Vandalism reports
MetaWiki requests
CheckUser information Deletion Permissions Username changes

Requests[edit]

[email protected][edit]

Status: Not done

List of users: Jeanis12345 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); 5.54.67.144 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); 89.210.176.72 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: el:Συζήτηση:ΝΕΡΙΤ Sports/Πρόταση διαγραφής/el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα
Reason(s): All three accounts contribute in the same field (Greek TV, especially NERIT and Eurovision) and in this case Jeanis12345 and his IPs has already voted twice against merger one as IP (89.210.176.72) and one as Jeanis12345. If i'm not mistaken, 89.210.176.72 has signed in a conversation as Jeanis12345. C messier (talk) 12:41, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@C messier: I am not sure of the reason for the checkuser, stewards would not normally publicly align a user account with an IP address. This looks to be a case of

It looks like a duck to me, and I am not sure of any advantage of running the checkuser. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:56, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Closed inactive request — billinghurst sDrewth 06:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

ხმელი ფოთოლი@ka.wikipedia[edit]

Status: Not done

List of users: ხმელი ფოთოლი (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); Absurd (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser)

CU log
Reason(s): Similar editions and comments in articles. It seems they are same persons using various usernames. Very similar editions and comments in articles. Please check this 2 users, thank you. David1010 (talk) 18:53, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

@David1010: What is the purpose of the checkuser? Why does it need a checkuser? Are they in breach of a policy? If so which? That people make similar edits or comments is not a sufficient reason to undertake a checkuser. If the editors are problematic, they don't need a checkuser, they can be managed by blocks, conversation, etc. — billinghurst sDrewth 23:39, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Comment Besides similar editions and comments in articles these two user are making same mistakes Intentionally, despite many reverts and warnings. e.g. this record means "I won't go from here until finally left your nerves disappointed". George ^Talk 19:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Closed problematic editors do not need checkuser. If they are problems, use existing tools to manage. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Trolling behaviour at frWS[edit]

Status: Done

List of users: Largentineestmorte (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: Example
Reason(s): Trolling behaviour at frWS name creation @Zyephyrus: (talk) 14:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Moved and reworded Special:PermanentLink/9364625 after checking with frWS — billinghurst sDrewth 14:52, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed Largentineestmorte, Ilipitis, Jouvenceuse, Goelandbleu, Vigieo1, Syndro77, Tournezlestalons, CloneE34, Denetsprogres12, Le dresseur des mots, Les plus fous 100, Tasmerdencore, Vieux garconnet, Fermentateur, Legrandsigle, Lemuriens, Lecolos, Bonvisage, Airdutemps5, Lebonentrepreneur, Droitdetravaillerlesamedi, Resterliberal, Oeilclou, Jaugerons. Blocking at request of admin via #wikisource. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Look like it didn't stop him/her: [1] Phe (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed Elfix 18:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

[email protected][edit]

Status: Not done

List of users: I7-860 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); 81.4.107.73 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); 66.96.183.1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); 38.110.116.61 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: fa:ویکی‌پدیا:حساب زاپاس
Reason(s): After an argument with fawiki User:Arash.pt, which led to a month-long block for User:I7-860, series of verbal incivilities started against User:Arash.pt by these IP Addresses. I was wondering if they were related to the blocked user:I7-860. Please see:

66.96.183.1 contributions and 81.4.107.73 contributions and 38.110.116.61 contributions. Almost all of them were considered insulting and therefore hidden by fawiki admins. In twilight (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Unfortunately, a request like this would violate a user's privacy by revealing their IP address. Please use behavioral analysis. --Rs chen 7754 05:26, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

آذر فرنبغ@fa.wikipedia[edit]

Status: Not done

List of users: آذر فرنبغ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); جمشید23 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); 109.225.147.103 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: fa:ویکی‌پدیا:حساب زاپاس
Reason(s): After users voted for his articles to be deleted (in Persian Wikipedia:Articles for deletion), this user (جمشید23) was blocked for one year for disruption and insulting other users and voters. Now it seems that he has created a new account (آذر فرنبغ) and is rebuilding the deleted articles. For instance, "علی محمد پشت دار", "عبدالرسول خیامپور" and "جلیل تجلیل" were all voted for deletion (and were deleted) and now they've been all created by user آذر فرنبغ with very same format and writing style.

A checkuser does not resolve the issue. You can resolve the issue with existing administrator tools, without a checkuser showing any association. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

سپاهی@fa.wikipedia[edit]

Status: Not done

List of users: Kharmagass (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser); سپاهی (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · cA · SULinfo · guc · checkuser)

CU log
Discussion: fa:ویکی‌پدیا:حساب زاپاس
Reason(s): new users with edit warring and problematic editions in same articles (like hamas and israel). other contibutions and writing style are also very similar.--همان (talk) 03:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

A checkuser is not required to resolve this situation. If the users are edit warring and otherwise problematic then administrators have available tools to manage this matter. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Steward requests/Checkuser

Contents

Requests[edit]

[email protected][edit]

ხმელი ფოთოლი@ka.wikipedia[edit]

Trolling behaviour at frWS[edit]

[email protected][edit]

آذر فرنبغ@fa.wikipedia[edit]

سپاهی@fa.wikipedia[edit]

See also[edit]

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Community

Beyond the Web

Print/export

Tools