Connected Learning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Connected learning is a type of learning that integrates personal interest, peer relationships, and achievement in academic, civic, or career-relevant areas.[1] In addition, connected learning is an approach to educational reform keyed to the abundance of information and social connection brought about by networked and digital media. Advocates of connected learning posit that this approach leverages new media to broaden access to opportunity and meaningful learning experiences.[1][2] The connected learning model suggests that youth learn best when: they are interested in what they are learning; they have peers and mentors who share these interests; and their learning is directed toward opportunity and recognition.[1][2] According to the proponents of connected learning, social support for interest-driven learning and connections to multiple sites of learning activity drive individual learning outcomes. These individual outcomes also lead to collective outcomes by building knowledge, capacity and expertise in diverse communities.[1][2] Environments that support connected learning are generally characterized as having a sense of shared purpose, a focus on production, and openly networked infrastructures.

HISTORY[edit]

Connected learning has been a term used in research since the early 1990s.[3][4] The original usages piggybacked on the concept of connected knowing,[5] which emphasized the importance of context in the development of knowledge for women. Many articles from this time used the term connected learning in reference to hands-on education like fieldwork[4] or internships which is tied to the concept of learning in context. The early research that used the term connected learning also shared the common theme of sociality being important to learning outcomes.[6] From 2000, the term connected learning began to be used in research publications to refer variously to project-based, networked, social, and information-age learning.[7][8][9][10] Cronwell and Cronwell created the first "framework and an organizing set of principles to guide educational research and development," (p. 17).[2] This research was supported by the Center for Internet Research. This connected learning framework is based on the following set of principles:

  • The education process must become learner-centered.
  • Assessment - diagnostic, formative, and summative - must be improved and deeply integrated into the learning and teaching process.
  • National and state academic standards must be met or exceeded.
  • Ethnic academic achievement "gaps" must be addressed and eliminated.
  • Learning must become more active.
  • The formation of lifelong learning behaviors must be facilitated.
  • Education reform must be guided by empiricism.
  • Well-designed, technology-enabled education reform will be self-improving, self-reforming and self-documenting.
  • Teaching and learning content must be of the highest possible quality, current and relevant.
  • Proven pedagogical methodologies and the best research from all field with a bearing on learning and teaching must be integrated into education.
  • The needs of all stakeholders (students, teachers, parents, administration, government, business, etc.) must be served.
  • Reform must also address the need to improve the formation and achievement of vocational goals by students.
  • Where minimum standards exist, the goal must be near-universal mastery rather than a standard distribution of achievement. (pp. 19)[2]

This idea of connected learning is supposed to be an alternative to traditional in-school instruction. They label this connected learning framework as a work in progress that needs more research to support it. However, no further research has been completed on this framework.

The connected learning model developed by Connected Learning Research Network and Connectedlearning.tv draws from sociocultural, cultural historical, social constructivist, and situated approaches to learning that stress how learning and development is embedded within social relationships and cultural contexts.[1] This framework of connected learning builds on Social_learning_theory sociocultural learning theory and empirical research that has documented learning in varied social and cultural settings, both within school and out of school. The connected learning approach is guided by the following three key findings that have emerged from this body of learning research: 1) a disconnect between classroom and everyday learning, 2) the meaningful nature of learning that is embedded in valued relationships, practice, and culture, and 3) the need for learning contexts that bring together in-school and out-of-school learning and activity.

A set of principles for connected learning were developed by a group of researchers, technology makers, philanthropists, and educational practitioners seeking to come together around a common approach for how to expand educational opportunity in the digital age.[11] At the core of connected learning are three values: equity, full participation and social connection. Connected learning is further defined by the following three learning principles and three design principles:

  • Interest-powered – Interests power the drive to acquire knowledge and expertise. Research shows that learners who are interested in what they are learning, achieve higher order learning outcomes.[12] Connected learning does not just rely on the innate interests of the individual learner, but views interests and passions as something to be actively developed in the context of personalized learning pathways that allow for specialized and diverse identities and interests.
  • Peer-supported – Learning in the context of peer interaction is engaging and participatory. Research shows that among friends and peers, young people fluidly contribute, share, and give feedback to one another, producing powerful learning.[13][14][15] Connected learning research demonstrates that peer learning need not be peer-isolated. In the context of interest-driven activity, adult participation is welcomed by young people.
  • Academically oriented – Educational institutions are centered on the principle that intellectual growth thrives when learning is directed towards academic achievement and excellence. Connected learning recognizes the importance of academic success for intellectual growth and as an avenue towards economic and political opportunity.
  • Shared purpose – Connected learning environments are populated with adults and peers who share interests and are contributing to a common purpose. Cross-generational learning and connection thrives when centered on common interests and goals.[16][17]
  • Production-centered – Connected learning environments are designed around production, providing tools and opportunities for learners to produce, circulate, curate, and comment on media. Learning that comes from actively creating, making, producing, experimenting, remixing, decoding, and designing, fosters skills and dispositions for lifelong learning and productive contributions to today’s rapidly changing work and political conditions.[18][19]
  • Openly networked – Connected learning environments are designed around networks that link together institutions and groups across various sectors, including popular culture, educational institutions, home, and interest communities. Learning is most resilient when it is linked and reinforced across settings of home, school, peer culture and community.[16][20][21][22][23][24][25]

Based on an ecological approach, the collective and individual outcomes of connected learning are seen as integrally related to one another. According to the connected learning model, if people are pursuing interests and meaningful social relationships in the service of society’s academic, civic, and workplace institutions, this will lead to broader communal and societal outcomes: high quality culture and knowledge products, civically-oriented collectives, and diverse and equitable pathways to opportunity.[1]

Research Initiatives[edit]

Connected Learning Research Network[edit]

The Connected Learning Research Network (CLRN) is a John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation’s supported interdisciplinary network of researchers whose work focuses on connected learning. The connected learning framework was unveiled on March 1, 2012 at the 2012 Digital Media and Learning Conference by members of the Connected Learning Research Network on behalf of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation’s Digital Media and Learning Initiative.[26] The network, which is dedicated to understanding the opportunities and risks for learning afforded by today’s changing media ecology, employs a mixed-method research agenda that looks broadly at how risks and opportunities in social media and learning are distributed among diverse populations and examines in detail the contexts and mechanisms through which connected learning can be supported.

Research network members include Mimi Ito: Research Director of the Digital Media and Learning Research Hub and CLRN network chair; Dalton Conley: New York University; Kris D. Gutiérrez: University of Colorado at Boulder; Sonia Livingstone: London School of Economics and Political Science; Vera Michalchik: SRI International; Bill Penuel: University of Colorado at Boulder; Jean Rhodes: University of Massachusetts, Boston; Juliet Schor: Boston College; and S. Craig Watkins: University of Texas at Austin.[27]

Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling (CCL)[edit]

The Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling (CCL) is housed at Northwestern University. The Center focuses on innovative methods of using technology to create a deeper learning experience.[28] This research group, originally founded at Tufts University in 1995, was relocated to Northwestern in 2000 by its founder Uri Wilensky. The research group includes educational researchers, curriculum developers, software engineers, and model builders, with students, staff, and researchers working together across universities. The center is funded in large part by Northwestern University and the National Science Foundation.

The center develops supports for formal and informal learning environments in the form of tools and curricula.[28] The CCLs main focus is in the development of computer-based modeling and simulations packages with supporting materials. One such computer-based modeling and simulation package is NetLogo. The NetLogo environment "enables learners to give simple rules to individual "agents" in a simulation and observe the collective result of all the agents' behavior."[28] Researchers have constructed models of complex natural and social phenomena within this environment. NetLogo comes with a library of models that have models of complex phenomena from a variety of fields including: biology, chemistry, physics, earth science economics, history, sociology, business, and medicine. These models are intended to be modified and used by a variety of educational levels from middle-school to undergraduate studies as part of model-based inquiry, as well as a basis for research in more advance studies.

The group also has studied "participatory simulation" in which they use role-playing in math and science classrooms "to explore how complex dynamic systems evolve over time."[29] Through technology they try to enable learners to have experiences that cross from the micro to the macro-level. The Center wants students to connect their new experiences with outside experiences. The CCL teachers and organizations tools and other materials.

Practitioner and Public Initiatives[edit]

Connected Learning Alliance[edit]

The Connected Learning Alliance was established in 2014 to build a coalition of organizations and coalesce grassroots efforts dedicated to spread connected learning to diverse populations and sites of practice. The organization’s website says: "Harnessing the abundance of the digital age to connect learners to their passion and education to opportunity – together, we can spark a powerful learning approach designed for our times."

Connectedlearning.tv[edit]

Connectedlearning.tv is a website that houses introductory information and resources regarding the connected learning model. The website is meant to be a gathering place for those interested in learning more about the research and vision behind the connected learning model and to discover those who already practicing connected learning. The website includes:

A weekly webinar series,

  • Videos about connected learning and the research behind it,
  • An infographic, an executive summary, and detailed white paper that researchers hope will activate conversation and collaboration among education reformers
  • An open-forum wiki for curating connected learning-related resources,
  • Detailed case studies of connected learning principles in practice, and;
  • Stories of educators, mentors, and youth within the broader digital media and learning community who are embracing the connected learning model.
  • Connectedlearning.tv also has a Connected Learning Google Plus community.

Connected Learning Exchange[edit]

The Connected Learning Exchange (CLX) is a global community of educators from schools, colleges and universities who are working together to share best practices and practical solutions that dramatically improve education everywhere. They try to engage K-12 educators, teachers, IT, edtech, technology leaders, CIOs, CTOs.

Connected Learning Manifesto[edit]

The connected learning manifesto was created by Connected Educators and Powerful Learning Practices as part of their Connected Educator Month in 2012. Connected educators and connected educator month is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education. The manifesto was collaboratively created by anyone who wanted to participate and ideas were brought together in one doc. The manifesto begins "We believe in messy learning within a culture of collaboration. Through non-linear, non-directed, self-initiated learning, collectively we find and solve problems within our networks, classrooms, communities, and the world."[30]

EDUCAUSE Connected Learning[edit]

EDUCAUSE’s Connected Learning focus was developed out of the EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative in May 2013. They define connected learning as "rooted in the active participation of students, instructors, advisors, and collaborators, offering the ability to connect courses, people, and resources to develop unique personalized learning pathways. This vision of education is of particular interest to those concerned with learner success and the growing role that collaboration plays in all facets of higher education."[31] EDUCAUSE focuses on information relevant for IT professionals and administrators to make an impact on higher education.

HIVE Chicago Re-imagining Learning[edit]

HIVE Chicago is a set of formal and informal learning environments, which are part of the larger HIVE Learning Network. A core mission of HIVE is to empower youth to make connections between their learning environments. HIVE is striving to re-imagine learning for youth and are using connected learning as part of their process. They see connected learning as "a work in progress, building on existing models, ongoing experimentation, and dialog with diverse stakeholders. It draws from social, ubiquitous, blended and personalized learning, delivered by new media, to help us remodel our educational system in tune with today’s economic and political realities."[32]

National Writing Project Connected Learning[edit]

The National Writing Project (NWP) runs a website called Educator Innovator so that educators can come together to discuss the implementation of technology in the classroom. One initiative that the NWP has undertaken on their Educator Innovator site is connected learning. For NWP, "Connected learning is when you’re pursuing knowledge and expertise around something you care deeply about, and you’re supported by friends and institutions who share and recognize this common passion or purpose."[33] NWP is reaching out to educators interested in innovative practice to share the potential benefits of connected learning as part of their practice.

NYC Department of Education Connected Learning[edit]

The New York City Department of Education, using a U.S. Department of Commerce grant, has a connected learning initiative in 72 of the city’s middle schools. Launched in 2010, the program’s mission is to boost broadband adoption and extend learning into the home through access to technology, low-cost broadband educational software, and a package of training and support for schools and families. Their focus on connected learning is "a comprehensive, multi-year program for middle schools that seeks to: support highly-effective and technology-intensive teaching; deepen the home/school connection; strengthen in-school tech capacity; and narrow the digital divide in underserved communities."[34]

Phillips Academy[edit]

Phillips Academy is an independent boarding school in Andover, MA with a long history dating back to its founding in 1778. The current head John Palfrey introduced connected learning in the school. Palfrey is quoted as saying "Connected learning is a reasoned and balanced approach to honoring tradition in building for the future."[35] An article on the Academy’s website describe connected learning as "a research-based model of learning that maintains successful traditional standards and introduces new ways of doing things that tap into the potential created by globalization and technology."[35]

Yokohama International School Connected Learning Community[edit]

Yokohama International School is a international school in Japan which was founded in 1924. The have developed the Connected Learning Community as a way to help their students integrate information technology with learning. The Connected Learning Community "aims to provide ever-present computing and network access for our students on a common learning platform, while further developing our educational practices to increase collaboration, enable flexible progression and differentiated instruction, and more actively reflect a real-world learning environment."[36] All middle and high school students are provided laptops for home and school use to offer continuity of learning.

Connected Learning Products[edit]

Connected Learning Network[edit]

The connected learning network develops platforms for web-based distance learning. They work with corporate trainers, educators, and administrators.

Connected Workplace[edit]

Connected workplace is a consultant firm that offers advice, workshops, and mentoring on 21st century enterprise. Their view of connected learning is very focused on the workplace, defining it as involving "connecting with and learning from other individuals both inside and outside the organisation."[37]

Disney’s Connected Learning[edit]

Disney’s Connected Learning portal offers games and curriculum to kids and parents. "Disney Connected Learning is an innovative system designed to connect world-class curriculum with fun games for kids. Powered by the DCL assessment engine, the Parent App empowers you to follow your child's progress and engage with their digital experiences."[38]

Examples of connected learning environments[edit]

Examples of learning environments that integrate peer, interest, and academic pursuits including athletics programs that are tied to in-school recognition, certain arts and civic learning programs, and interest-driven academic programs such as math, chess, or robotics competitions. These connected learning environments embody values of equity, social belonging, and participation. Connected learning environments include a sense of shared purpose, a focus on production, and openly networked infrastructures.[1] Learning environments that embody principles of connected learning include:

Connected Learning and Education Reform[edit]

Today, American youth are entering a labor market strikingly different from earlier generations.[39][40][41][42] Traditional pathways through schooling toward stable careers are an option for fewer young people; in their current form, schools can only deliver opportunity to a shrinking proportion of youth. Income inequality has sharpened significantly in the last few decades,[39] (Mishel, et al., 2012), and while a college degree has become a requirement for most good jobs, it is no longer a guarantee of acquiring one.[43] In this era of economic contraction,[44][45][46][47][48] disparities in access to educational, economic, and political opportunity have become starker, and continue to be tied in troubling ways to racial and ethnic background. Complicating this picture is a rapidly changing landscape of young people’s media and technology engagements. Youth are increasingly immersed in media. In 1999, U.S. youth between age eight and eighteen spent, on average, 7.29 hours a day using media.[12] By 2010, the typical American youth was spending nearly eleven hours a day with some form of media.[12] In an environment where good jobs are scarce and traditional career pathways serve a shrinking and privileged minority, optimizing existing educational pathways, assessments, and accountability systems will not serve an equity agenda on its own. Connected learning does not strive to improve this individual competitiveness, but addresses the overall health of communities and learning writ large, centering on the values of equity, full participation and collective contribution.[1] Many prior attempts to mobilize technology in the service of educational reform have failed because interventions have focused narrowly on the deployment of particular media or technologies, without considering broader social, political, or economic conditions (Ito, 2009; Tyack and Cuban, 1995; Cuban, 2003).[49][50][51] Unlike efforts at educational change that focus on technology deployment or institutional reform, connected learning takes a networked approach to social change that aligns with its ecological perspective.[1][2] According to connected learning proponents, systemic change requires linked efforts across different sites of learning and the optimal opportunity for educational change lies in connecting like-minded reform efforts across sectors of home, popular culture, technology, and education. Connected learning as an approach to educational reform seeks to elevate all young people, with an emphasis on seeing outcomes not only in terms of individual success and competitiveness, but in relation to the health of the groups, communities, and institutions that build and support connected learning environments.[1]

Critical Reception[edit]

Connected learning since its recent ramp up has been well received from the global education community.[52][53][54][55][56][57] Educators and policymakers have raised concerns regarding the new model of learning laid out by research and practitioner groups, which included:

  • Connected learning is "yet another buzz word for the corporatization of education."[58]
  • Connected learning is devoid of critical thinking as it relies on "a formula for students getting what they already want to find . . . . . [rather than] broadening horizons to discover what is not already known."[59]
  • The model gives no mention of key K-12 educators who have been pushing for similar types of networked/connected learning for the past decade.[60]
  • Increased workload for those who support learners is also a concern[31]

CLRN network chair Mimi Ito responded to the criticism pointing out that, "the connected learning principles were developed with a very diverse range of practitioners in K-12 and other learning institutions like museums and libraries, as well as people working in popular culture/media, technology, and university researchers. So while the research network hopes to provide a research component to feed the broader connected learning effort, we are by no means the driving force behind it.”[57]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Ito, M.; Gutiérrez, K.; Livingstone, S.; Penuel, B.; Rhodes, J.; Salen, K.; Schor, J.; Sefton-Green, J.; Watkins, S.G. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f Cornwell, W. R.; Cornwell, J. R. (2006). "Connected learning: A framework of observation, research and development to guide the reform of education". Breckenridge, CO: The Center for Internet Research. 
  3. ^ Schwartz, K. B. (1991). "Clinical reasoning and new ideas on intelligence: Implications for teaching and learning". American Journal of Occupational Therapy 45 (11). 
  4. ^ a b Lundeberg, M. A.; Moch, S. D. (1995). "Influence of social interaction of cognition: Connected learning in Science". The Journal of Higher Education 66 (3). 
  5. ^ Belenky, M. F.; Clinchy, B. M.; Goldberger, N. R.; Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing. New York: Basic Books. 
  6. ^ Tinto, V. (1998). "Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously". The Review of Higher Education 21 (2). 
  7. ^ Vaz, R. F. (2000). "Connected learning: Interdisciplinary projects in international settings". Liberal Education 86 (1). 
  8. ^ Downes, T.; Zammit, K. (2001). "New literacies for connected learning in global classrooms". Information and Communication Technologies 86 (1). 
  9. ^ Kearns, P. (2002). Towards the connected learning society: An international overview of trends in policy for information and communication technology in education. Kambah, Australian Capital Territory: Global Learning Services. 
  10. ^ Cazden, C. B. "Connected learning: "Weaving" in classroom lessons". Keynote address for Pedagogy in Practice 2006 conference. 
  11. ^ "Mimi Ito comment". March 5, 2012. 
  12. ^ a b c Agarwal, R.; Karahanna, E. (2000). "Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage". MIS Quarterly 24 (4). 
  13. ^ Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial. ASIN 0060920432. 
  14. ^ Ghani, J.; Deshpande, S. P. (1994). "Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction". The Journal of Psychology 128 (4). 
  15. ^ Steinberg, L. (1990). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon and Schuster. ASIN 0684835754. 
  16. ^ a b Ito, M.; Baumer, S.; Bittanti, M.; boyd, d.; Cody, R.; Herr-Stephenson, B.; Horst, H. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
  17. ^ Austin, K.; Ehrlich, S.; Puckett, C.; Singleton, J. (2011). YOUmedia Chicago: Reimagining learning, literacies, and libraries: A snapshot year 1. Chicago: Consortium of Chicago School Research. 
  18. ^ Thomas, D.; Brown, J. S. (2011). A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. ASIN 1456458884. 
  19. ^ Hagel III, J.; Brown, J. S. (2011). The only sustainable edge: Why business strategy depends on productive friction and dynamic specialization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. ASIN 1591397200. 
  20. ^ Cremin, L. (1977). Traditions of American education. New York: Basic Books. ASIN 0465086845. 
  21. ^ Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge. ASIN 0415317762. 
  22. ^ Sefton-Green, J.; Nixon, H.; Erstad, O. (2009). "Reviewing approaches and perspectives on "digital literacy"". Pedagogies An International Journal 4 (2). 
  23. ^ Varnelis, K. (2008). Networked publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ASIN 0262220857. 
  24. ^ Bradsford, J. D.; Schwartz, D. L. (2001). "Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications (pp. 61-100)". Review of Research in Education 24. 
  25. ^ Lave, J. (2011). Apprenticeship in critical ethnographic practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 
  26. ^ "Digital Media & Learning MacArthur Foundation". 
  27. ^ "Connected Learning Research Network". 
  28. ^ a b c "About the CCL". 
  29. ^ "Participatory Simulations". 
  30. ^ "Connected learning manifesto". 
  31. ^ a b "7 Things you should know about connected learning". 
  32. ^ "Re-imagining learning". 
  33. ^ "About connected learning". 
  34. ^ "About the program". 
  35. ^ a b "Connected learning". 
  36. ^ "Connected learning community". 
  37. ^ "Connected learning in the workplace". 
  38. ^ "Connected learning". 
  39. ^ a b Mishel, L.; Bivens, J.; Gould, E.; Shierholz, H. (2012). The state of working America 12th edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ASIN 0801478553. 
  40. ^ Bowles, S.; Gintis, H.; Osborne Grove, M. (2008). Unequal Chances: Family Background and Economic Success.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 
  41. ^ Elder, S.; Kapsos, S.; Sparreboom, T. (2010). Global Employment Trends For Youth. Geneva: International Labour Office. 
  42. ^ Mishel, L.; Bernstein, J.; Shierholz, H. (2009). The State of Working America 2008/2009. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press. ASIN 0801474779. 
  43. ^ Mishel, L. (2012). "Entry-level workers’ wages fell in lost decade.". Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute. 
  44. ^ Duncan, G.; Murnane, R. (2011). Whither Opportunity?: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances.. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. 
  45. ^ Levine, M. (2006). The Price of Privilege: How Parental Pressure and Material Advantage Are Creating a Generation of Disconnected and Unhappy Kids. New York, NY: HarperCollins. ASIN 006059585X. 
  46. ^ Pope, D. (2001). Doing School: How We Are Creating a Generation of Stressed Out, Materialistic, and Miseducated Students. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press. ASIN 006059585X. 
  47. ^ Gutiérrez, K.; Izquierdo, C.; Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2010). "Middle Class Working Families’ Ideologies and Engagement in Children’s Extracurricular Activities.". International Journal of Learning 17 (3). 
  48. ^ Luthar, S.; Latendresse, S. (2005). "Children of the Affluent: Challenges to Well-Being.". Current Directions in Psychological Science 14 (1). 
  49. ^ Ito, M. (2009). Engineering play: A cultural history of children’s software. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 
  50. ^ Tyack, D.; Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 
  51. ^ Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 
  52. ^ "YALSA 2014 President’s Program on Connected Learning". 
  53. ^ "Connectedlearning.tv/infographic twitter results". 
  54. ^ "Connectedlearning.tv/what-is-connected-learning twitter results". 
  55. ^ Gerstein, J. "Connected learning: A new research-driven initiative". 
  56. ^ Heick, T. "Connected learning: The power of social learning models". 
  57. ^ a b "Teachers guide to 21st century learning: Connected learning". 
  58. ^ "Can connected learning work at the college level?". 
  59. ^ "The Threat to Connected Learning". 
  60. ^ "Connected Learning: What have they done with Alec, Will, Vicki?".