Discussion:Live in a State of Non Attachment

An "Attachment" is defined as: "An enduring emotional bond that develops between one adult and another in an intimate relationship. 2. Devotion and regard that binds an individual to another person; a thing; a cause; or an ideal." In Step 1, the author states: "Learn to let go of something that you don't hold a strong bond to first .." and refers to examples of 'old clothing and worn-out shoes' as items of attachment. The very definition of the word "attachment" disqualifies the author's premise - because one would hardly be devoted to their own old clothing or worn-out shoes. In Step 6, the author states: "Nothing defines you or dictates who you are ..." If that is a reference to materialistic things, then the claim stands. However; what DOES define an individual and dictates who they are; are their qualities of integrity and principled behavior ... an unflappable moral character that is intact and non-negotiable; honesty; kindness; compassion. I argue that these qualities most definitely define who a person is; and most assuredly dictate who they are. Subsequently, the author's claim that "nothing defines you or dictates who you are", is invalid. I found other aspects of this article to lack veracity - and suggestions were offered that bore no relevance to attachment; in the true sense of the word. As well, statements were made that simply could not be applied to everyone all the way across the board. An example of this occurred in the opening paragraph; which states that "one's soul truly desires giving up all possessions and living off the land." It is most presumptuous to assume that this is what everyone's soul truly desires - because it isn't! But of paramount importance, was the manner in which this author put the information forth. Everything the author said was stated with authority, as though it was unquestionably valid; but a large part of it wasn't. Since the word "attachment" refers to to an enduring emotional bond between individuals; or a firm dedication to an ideal that is supporting a cause to be carried out - from the gate, the author used an erroneous word on which to base the notions that were discussed. A more fitting title would have referred to the encumbrances that clutter a person's life. When an author's information is incorrect but said with authority as though it is, they do a disservice to the reader who hasn't the life experience or adequate education to discern whether or not the information is valid. Subsequently, that reader takes on information that isn't correct - and in the arena of self-help articles, the end result could be devastating. Self-help articles are supposed to do just that - not hinder.