User_talk: Maluniu

You said Not sure if it's out of boredom or you get a rise out of adding sarcasm into articles, but edits such as http://www.wikihow.com/index.php?title=Bake-Honey-Melon-Cookies&diff=17553270&oldid=17552905 , per the stuffed duck and snow plough mention doesn't help. I've revised the article and removed the nfd tag, as the stub is sufficient. Let me know your thoughts or opinions.

I add irrelevant, random details to incomplete articles to entertain myself and to illustrate the uselessness of some articles, in much the same way other users write woefully incomplete articles, add obscenities to articles and add advertising links. We can all do pretty much what we like here. It is fortunate that much of what I like doing is productive. Sadly others make unproductive edits. People tell them not do it, but they don't stop, so why should I? Actually people aren't told not to write useless articles, they get told their nonsensical article 'is off to a good start".

The article made no more sense before my stuffed duck and snow plough edit. It still makes no sense. It will probably be a stub forever or will be completely re-written by someone who actually knows how to make, 'a favorite treat of many people.' It's been as bad as it is since November 2014 after all. No one seems very inclined to sort it out, maybe because there's no enough to go, it is incomplete.

Thank you for asking for my thoughts and opinions. I am always happy to share them on wikiHow.

"I'm quite confused as to how making more work for people to fix up is being "productive". - allow me to clarify, I only said that much of what I like doing is productive. I never said all. "Yes, there are people out there whom wish to go that route, but you don't need to be one of them nor add to the list of attention-seekers, vandalizers, and people who get a kick out of things as such." ' No, I don't need to be, but, I don't need to do or not do anything on wikiHow. No one is obliged to do, or not do anything. It's all a choice. "because it's been a stub for the past 7 months does not mean it's useless." - in your opinion, which you are entitled to, just like I am entitled to my opinion. " There's plenty of articles tagged as stubs for a few years, and over time, they do eventually either get re-written or work on (either by a single person or several people)." - yes, and many of that ARE stubs and not incomplete, which I still say the Bake Honey Melon Cookies article is. In an effort not to take up any more of the time of the volunteers working on recent changes patrol, I suggest we either bring this dialogue to a close and both continue using wikiHow the ways we enjoy doing so or, move this to a forum. I thank you for your advice regarding changing my ways and perception of wikiHow. I will consider doing that.

can you look at how to stop dog fighting rings for me thank you?

Hello! I am sooo confused, I have a kindle fire and I switched it to desktop mode. How do I switch back? Anyways, MooKiss, Signed, MooMooShadows! 😆

No probelm. Desktop version is kind of cool. XD