CⓐmeronNeylon

@CameronNeylon

Professor of Research Communications at How do we make research more effective and communications more open?

N 55°56' 0'' / W 3°11' 0''
Připojil se únor 2008

Uživatel @CameronNeylon je blokovaný.

Opravdu chcete tyto tweet zobrazit? Zobrazením tweetů uživatele @CameronNeylon neodblokujete.

  1. From Ethics and innovation can go hand in hand (yes even in health tech) if only you have the imagination:

  2. Few yrs back a paper from Canada showing it would have been cheaper to give funds to all eligible applicants than run grant cycle?

  3. Are you a librarian? Help 's OA Cooperative Study by filling out a survey:

  4. "Believe me...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about with interesting data..."

  5. NATURAL JUSTICE: Should Research Communications Be Shared?” Indigen...

  6. Reakce na uživatele

    . Ouch. So it was five years ago today I came down in the morning to find you still working in the hotel foyer?

  7. Maybe its just me but if you were an app based startup that picks up and drops off & a pick up was an hour late would you contact the user?

  8. Now I'm a humanist I guess I might need to reassess my assumption that getting mad while writing a paper is a bad thing?

  9. Reakce na uživatele

    . So it may be many people searching for PeerJ impact factor rather than preprints IF. Well I can hope anyway...

  10. Reakce na uživatele

    . It may actually be not that bad. Google may know that PeerJ is a journal and that ppl only care about one thing abt jrnls..

  11. As a side note to all those excited about on . His data is not available in the UK...

  12. New post up in PolEcon of OA Series. Economies of scale (or why Elsevier, Wiley, Springer are still there)

  13. program is now posted. Registration also open

  14. Francis Bacon: "knowledge is power" Michel Foucault: "knowledge is power, but in, like...a much more sinister way."

  15. I wonder what Mancur Olsen would have made of Patreon and crowd funding more generally...

  16. Is this why publishers drive new infrastructure & institutions stand back? Olsen-The Logic of Collective Action p45

  17. ps on that last retweet is the raw(ish) data available anywhere? Covariance with demographics would be valuable...

  18. Biased sample but this significant I think: 84% of respondents who'd never used scihub think 'article piracy' fine

  19. Fear Trumps Hope: USA, April 2016 Hope trumps fear: London, May 2016 Trump fears hope: USA, November 2016?

  20. Reakce na uživatele

    . What would you give as examples of truly international journals? I can name a few that try but is a long way to go

  21. & African Research Publishing - reflects on 's Leadership Dialogue

  22. I would say you can't unless you can change definition of 'international' away from 'of interest to Anglo-Americans'

  23. Lots of excited “oh, wow” moments as faculty make their first annotations in right now.

  24. So should I draw line between publishing ppl in my timeline upset with Apple Music & why some of us aren't happy with CHORUS/Readcube etc?

  25. In a few minutes I'll participate in a webinar on attribution with !

  26. An object lesson in why scholarly publishing isn't as cheap as we'd like to imagine it could be:

  27. The World Some People’s Opinions About University Reputations Rankings has just b… ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

  28. So here is a demonstration of why online scholarly publishing isn't as cheap as some people think it ought to be...

  29. So encouraging WORKING BEYOND BORDERS: WHY WE NEED GLOBAL DIVERSITY IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS

  30. Not just more of the same. Why we need global diversity in scholarly communications.

  31. I love this slide: "The weird things humans do with spreadsheets"

  32. Observation: The Consultation Paper on Engagement and Impact doesn't seem to refer to any Aus research

  33. Congrats to Dorothea Salo who was awarded the Baldwin WI Idea Grant to unique audiovisual materials.

  34. Consultation Paper released: Engagement & Impact Assessment. Stakeholder feedback due 24 June 2016.

  35. Here’s my longer take on analyzing the Sci-Hub data from along with data from .

  36. Contents of scientific papers changed very little from their pre-print to final published version

Načítání se zjevně nějak vleče.

Možná je překročena kapacita Twitteru nebo došlo k momentálnímu zablokování. Zkuste to znovu nebo se podívejte na stavovou stránku Twitteru, kde najdete další informace.

    Také by se vám mohlo líbit

    ·