Stacey Gray

@staceygraydc

lawyer | science & tech optimist | Policy Counsel at (views my own).

Washington, D.C.
Iscrizione a novembre 2009
36 foto e video Foto e video

Tweet

Hai bloccato @staceygraydc

Vuoi davvero vedere questi Tweet? Procedendo non sbloccherai @staceygraydc

  1. ha ritwittato
    28 ott

    & I are especially grateful to for their super insights into improving our quest to define & map ‘fairness’ as the meeting point of US and EU privacy/data protection law 🙏

    4 risposte 4 Retweet 18 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  2. ha ritwittato
    28 ott

    French data protection regulator declares in school illegal. What a victory for the of the kids over there!

    La CNIL vient de déclarer illégale l'expérimentation de reconnaissance faciale dans les lycées de la Région Sud. Cette première victoire appelle à continuer et renforcer la lutte contre les dispositifs existants et futurs.
    3 risposte 136 Retweet 202 Mi piace
    Annulla
  3. 28 ott

    MacTaggart seems to confirm repeatedly throughout this 20-min interview that CCPA is all about reining in existing behavioral advertising practices (not just the bad actors).

    Alastair Mactaggart on Data Privacy Laws (via ) cc: &
    1 Retweet 4 Mi piace
    Annulla
  4. ha ritwittato
    15 ott

    "All of this has happened before, and it will all happen again.” (also note the similarities to CPREA: )

    I still can't stop being amazed by the 1973 HEW Report, which recommended a US Federal Code for Fair Information Practice. Check this out - it recommended all those goodies that are currently a GDPR trademark, starting with having some sort of DPO in place 1/ :
    Mostra questa discussione
    2 risposte 7 Retweet 15 Mi piace
    Annulla
  5. 15 ott

    Go go! Fellow alumna 💪🏼

    The brilliant & committed has led the charge against poor facial recognition tech governance from the start. + for producing an informative short vid featuring Clare. Everyone teaching privacy should show it in class!
    5 Mi piace
    Annulla
  6. ha ritwittato
    10 ott

    California AG publishes the draft to implement ! Accepts comments on them until December 6. Let me know if you find something interesting, I'll have to wait for the weekend to read due to overflow of privacy reading and writing 🧐

    15 risposte 31 Retweet 53 Mi piace
    Annulla
  7. 8 ott

    More quality research supporting PRAs.👇🏼💯thanks Prof. Jerome.

    Returning to 's whatabout on Private Rights of Action, she's absolutely right they've been an interesting enforcement mechanism over the years, but woulda sued me if I'd written any more words. 1/10
    Mostra questa discussione
    1 risposta 1 Mi piace
    Annulla
  8. ha ritwittato
    8 ott

    Superb thread on , and brings down the hammer!

    In risposta a @OrinKerr, @Riana_Crypto e @Susan_Hennessey
    Privacy? What hangs in the balance here is integrity — in the technical sense of a signature across data; crypto does that too — and if we lose that we lose all. If we backdoor content of comms, we lose ensuring comms weren't changed in transit/storage
    2 Retweet 4 Mi piace
    Annulla
  9. ha ritwittato
    7 ott

    Okay! So what happened in the last two hours at the ? Here is my thread of other people's tweets w/ presenting, & a panel w/ him, , , , , , & me!

    1 risposta 6 Retweet 11 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  10. 7 ott

    My hope is that today's Panel 4 panelists will discuss the usefulness of "persistent identifier" and its exempted uses ("internal operations") as a model legal framework for a broader federal privacy law &/or state privacy laws.

    The panelists are James Cooper (w/ Scalia Law School), Harry Jho (w/ ), Katharina Kopp (w/ ), Jonathan Mayer ( w/ Princeton), Kate O’Loughlin ( w/ ) & Julia Tama (w/ Venable).
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  11. ha ritwittato
    7 ott

    What does the future of look like? presents her expertise at an workshop exploring whether COPPA should be updated. Watch the livestream as leaders share their insights:

    1 Retweet 1 Mi piace
    Annulla
  12. 7 ott

    As a result - esp if Congress will draft a privacy law w anti-discrimination provisions - carefully tailored PRA(s) will likely strike the right balance bt industry concerns & recognition of privacy/data protection as fundamental individual (not just "consumer") right. 4/4

    4 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  13. 7 ott

    .. especially during times of deliberate government inaction. It's also important to permit certain types of enforcement when the violation is not monetary (consider: an unreasonable search or seizure) but the plaintiff has been wronged and deserves their 'day in court.' 3/4

    1 risposta 1 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  14. 7 ott

    My only concern is that the article () gives short thrift to the benefits of PRAs. They're much more than cost-saving measures for enforcement agencies. Incredibly important mechanism in the last 100 yrs to vindicate individual rights violations... 2/4

    1 risposta 1 Retweet 9 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  15. 7 ott

    Helpful article from independent privacy expert in last week's that PRA in a federal law is being treated w/ false "yes or no" absolutism, to the detriment of progress on a federal law. Totally agree! Although... 1/

    1 risposta 5 Retweet 7 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  16. ha ritwittato
    7 ott

    You have been warned: today I am live-tweeting ’s workshop on the future of the COPPA rule! Stay tuned for nerdy child/student privacy posts all day 😍

    4 risposte 20 Retweet 57 Mi piace
    Mostra questa discussione
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  17. ha ritwittato
    3 ott

    Here is a more detailed look at after mulling over the judgment. It is so relevant that the Court made all its findings under the old Directive! I also do believe the findings invalidate the 'by scrolling, you consent' model & post explains why:

    1 risposta 29 Retweet 55 Mi piace
    Annulla
  18. 2 ott

    Useful informative thread from my colleague on today’s cookie consent decision from the EU Court of Justice. 🍪 🙌🏼 👇🏻

    CJEU confirmed once and for all today, in , that pre-ticked boxes and *inaction* are not sufficient to obtain valid consent for placing on people’s devices. But there are a couple of other interesting findings 1/10
    Mostra questa discussione
    Annulla
  19. ha ritwittato
    1 ott

    All those default opt in cookie folks reading the CJEU decision this morning like:

    1 risposta 5 Retweet 16 Mi piace
    Annulla
  20. 28 set

    I‘ve been saying this publicly and often lately — few are comfortable w the logic of online ad tech biz models moving to physical IoT (specificly home devices & esp. when we already pay for them in $$). It’s clear this discomfort is driving much of the wave of state legislation.

    Whoa, this thread seems to have hit a nerve. We're used to our phones being surveillance devices but not our TVs. Can we do better than fighting⁠ (and losing⁠) this battle in every new domain? I see only one way: let's de-legitimize targeted advertising as a business model.
    5 Retweet 9 Mi piace
    Annulla

@staceygraydc non ha ancora twittato.

Il caricamento sembra essere lento.

Twitter potrebbe essere sovraccarico o avere un problema temporaneo. Riprova o visita Twitter Status per ulteriori informazioni.

    Potrebbero piacerti

    ·