Ana Brandusescu

@anabmap

People, data, tech, dialogue, progress. Research + Policy . Previously , , . Views are mine.

London
linkedin.com/pub/ana-brandu…
Joined September 2011
350 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @anabmap

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @anabmap

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Jun 21

    Going (way) back in time: I wrote about my journey with tech and adapting to a new country.

    3 retweets 12 likes
  2. 6 hours ago

    Join now on FB live – Canada in the World: Towards Canadian-Led w/ , &

    Join us on FB live at 1:30 p.m. (EDT) tomorrow with the CEO of the Open Government Partnership
    1 retweet
  3. Retweeted
    Nov 1

    /If/ -You are working on -On Gender -On accountability -Or with marginalised group.. Let do Ping me.

    5 replies 14 retweets 15 likes
  4. Retweeted
    Nov 1

    An request was submitted in Sept for the impact studies – here’s the reply, via :

    5 retweets
  5. Retweeted
    Nov 1

    What is Canadian-led open government? Read the new report by &

    9 retweets 13 likes
  6. Retweeted
    Nov 1
    Replying to

    FB is easy target at these hearings. Don't forget Google has a lot of power, more than FB. Amazon isn't even at the table. They should be.

    1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
  7. Retweeted
    Nov 1
    Replying to

    Logistical question. Why did Google switch up their lawyer/rep?

    1 reply 1 retweet
  8. Retweeted
    Nov 1
    Replying to

    Live: Round two — Facebook, Twitter & Google to testify in Senate Russia hearings.

    1 reply 3 retweets
  9. Retweeted
    Nov 1

    & makes an appearance in Senate testimony by Facebook, Twitter & Google. Unsurprising that examples are all anodyne

    1 retweet 1 like
  10. Nov 1
    Replying to

    Question never really answered by FB. Hope they have an actual hearing on this topic alone, as suggested. 3/

  11. Nov 1
    Replying to

    "We believe that political expression is at core of what we provide." : "What if political expression is prohibited in a country?" 2/

    1 reply
  12. Nov 1
    Replying to

    A side but important note on FB: "We have the capability to ensure that our service complies with local law. That's accurate." 1/

    1 reply
  13. Nov 1
    Replying to

    on Terms of Service for all three companies: "Is a foreign influence campaign a violation of your ToS?" FB says yes.

    1 reply
  14. Nov 1
    Replying to

    Update: still disappointed with their answers. Brought up the potential risk of cyber warfare. They didn't really react.

    1 reply
  15. Nov 1
    Replying to

    : "We are not going to go away, gentlemen. [Yesterday] I asked specific questions, and got vague answers. And that won't do."

    1 reply
  16. Nov 1
    Replying to

    FB is easy target at these hearings. Don't forget Google has a lot of power, more than FB. Amazon isn't even at the table. They should be.

    1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
  17. Nov 1
    Replying to

    on FB not having their data analysis ready: "We've had this hearing scheduled for months. I find your answer very disappointing."

    1 reply
  18. Nov 1
    Replying to

    : "Will you commit to continue to work with this committee to provide additional info & additional documents?" All agree to commit.

    1 reply
  19. Nov 1
    Replying to

    Google trying to downplay being the biggest search engine ever: "We're not a social network. We don't know our user details in same way."

    1 reply
  20. Nov 1
    Replying to

    Logistical question. Why did Google switch up their lawyer/rep?

    1 reply 1 retweet
  21. Nov 1
    Replying to

    Live: Round two — Facebook, Twitter & Google to testify in Senate Russia hearings.

    1 reply 3 retweets

@anabmap hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·