Skip to content
#

digital-forensics

Here are 70 public repositories matching this topic...

TheHive
crackytsi
crackytsi commented Mar 3, 2020

Bug / Feature Request

Work Environment

Question Answer
OS version (server) Debian
OS version (client) 10
TheHive version / git hash 4 RC1
Package Type DEB

Problem Description

There are no longer any default dashboards

Possible Solutions

Add the default da

a2dd
a2dd commented Feb 7, 2019

Sorry, not enough english to explain correctly, I'll try to reproduce it:

:  man tcpflow | col -b | grep scan_http
	      tcpflow -e scan_http -o outdir host sundown
: su -
Password: 
root: tcpflow -e scan_http -o outdir host example.org
Invalid scanner name 'scan_http'
root: tcpflow -e http -o outdir host example.org     
reportfilename: outdir/report.xml
tcpflow: listening on wlp
Cortex
ZSZ72
ZSZ72 commented Dec 3, 2019

Work Environment

Question Answer
OS version (server) Ubuntu
OS version (client) 10
Cortex version / git hash Fresh install from DEB
Package Type DEB
Browser type & version Firefox

Problem Description

After updating database in Cortex, when the create adminis

velociraptor
scudette
scudette commented Feb 29, 2020

Artifact output is one or more tables with column names set by the VQL itself. It is often convenient to forward artifact output to additional systems and so it would be nice to develop some naming guidelines around columns.

Additionally it would be useful to develop a minimal set of columns to output so each row can be tagged in an external system (e.g. Elastic index).

This bug is to facili

TheHiveDocs
Cortex-Analyzers
milesflo
milesflo commented Feb 12, 2020

Describe the bug
The following analyzers are missing cortexutils:

  • SpamhausDBL
  • ProofPoint
  • TeamCymruMHR
  • Umbrella

To Reproduce
find ./analyzers -name "requirements.txt" -print -exec cat {} \;

Complementary information
The current dep. installation implementation allowed this error to slip under the radar, but containerized analyzers did not have this critical depe

bug
c-aff4
jonstewart
jonstewart commented Sep 3, 2019

Hola,

I'd potentially like to use aff4 in a new project, but I'm not sure where to start.

  • Where can I read the docs?
  • Who's in charge?
  • What policies apply? (I note my team member has made significant contributions and had to change them to conform with the notoriously C++-hostile Google C++ "Style" Guidelines. But then... it seems... the API is C++-based? So there are ABI breakage iss
ajnelson-nist
ajnelson-nist commented Apr 9, 2018

I ran verify.py against all the examples in this directory, and got verification issues (terms not in case.ttl) with these files:

  • Oresteia.json
  • accounts.json
  • bulk_extractor_forensic_path.json
  • file.json
  • forensic_lifecycle.json
  • message.json
  • multipart_file.json
  • raw_data.json

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the digital-forensics topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the digital-forensics topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more

You can’t perform that action at this time.