Global Digital Policy Incubator

@Stanford_GDPi

Stanford’s GDPi is a multi-stakeholder collaboration hub to inspire policy innovations that enhance freedom, security, & trust in the global digital ecosystem.

Stanford, CA
cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu/global-digital…
Joined February 2018
188 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

You blocked @Stanford_GDPi

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @Stanford_GDPi

  1. Pinned Tweet
    2 Aug 2019

    CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: and GDPi are looking for civil society advocates to join us at Stanford University for a Tech Camp for Civic Space Defenders. Applications are due 9/1/2019

    Are you working on the legal framework for civil society & philanthropy in your country and curious about the impact of AI and digital technologies? Apply for 's Tech Camp for Civic Space Defenders, co-organized by Stanford’s :
    14 retweets 15 likes
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    29 Jul 2019

    I have an op ed in today’s Washington Post. It breaks down the silliness of saying CDA 230 requires/should require “neutrality.” It also points out that worries about platform content removals are universal, not partisan; and lists more relevant responses.

    7 replies 111 retweets 211 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    24 Jul 2019

    What's the evolution of thinking about , the companies that dominate it, and their responsibility to the tenets of free speech? discusses the mission to improve democratic values and human rights in the digital realm

    6 retweets 4 likes
    Undo
  4. 13 Jun 2019

    Yesterday, GDPi, & consulted the community on the creation of a multistakeholder social media council for content moderation. Thank you to our speakers, those who attended our session & to for a wonderful

    8 retweets 19 likes
    Undo
  5. 12 Jun 2019

    GDPi staff enjoying the opening ceremonies at ! If you're at RightsCon today, join & at 5:15 in Carthage 2 (Laico) for our session on multistakeholder models of content moderation:

    4 retweets 7 likes
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    7 Jun 2019

    Stanford Report Outlines 2020 Election Security Fears, Solutions - with and via

    3 retweets 3 likes
    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    Stanford University new Cyber Policy Center launched today, Our shared priority: deter+build resilience against foreign election interference “Our recommendations are practical, concrete, and achievable before 2020” but action much be taken now,

    4 replies 54 retweets 122 likes
    Undo
  8. 7 Jun 2019

    "Across [Africa], the average citizen pays 8% of their monthly salary for 1GB of mobile data [...] The introduction of additional taxes on internet use has dramatically limited the rise of connectivity." on digital taxes and Africa:

    1 retweet 1 like
    Undo
  9. 6 Jun 2019

    GDPi’s and , along with, and introducing our program at the launch event of ’s Center. 🎥 Tune in: And learn more about our work:

    6 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    It's not just about legality - it's abt international legitimacy. Much of 's interference was not illegal. That legitimacy extends to any responses that we implement, but we have to recognize that there is a need for active response. at

    1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    Election Report Sounds Alarms on Voting Integrity via , with "Securing American Elections" co-authors and

    1 reply 17 retweets 28 likes
    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    At least 3 distinctions btwn approaches to digital engagement on politics in other countries: ✔️ Intent (What goal w/r/t to free elections/democracy?) ✔️ Transparency (Who is paying?) ✔️ Fidelity to truth (Commitment to honest discourse?)

    6 retweets 13 likes
    Undo
  13. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    "We've been so focused on the question of whether what the Russians did in 2016 actually changed the election outcome that we've lost sight of the fact that those behaviors should really be objectionable across political parties and nations"

    4 retweets 12 likes
    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    Will China follow Russia's example in trying to influence in foreign elections? Stanford's says yes, and cites allegations about the 2018 Taiwan elections. Background here:

    1 reply 4 retweets 2 likes
    Show this thread
    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    Important for commitment to int'l norms to be held by collective of countries rather than propelled solely by the US. Similarly, when information warfare is waged to undermine democracy, we must go beyond elections and condemn the behavior itself.

    1 reply 7 retweets 9 likes
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    8 retweets 26 likes
    Undo
  17. 6 Jun 2019

    Join us live and hear from GDPi’s and speaking about transparency and international norms in the context of US elections. Livestream:

    2 retweets 6 likes
    Undo
  18. 6 Jun 2019

    Join us live at the conference as & Allison Berke discuss how international norms and agreements can help prevent election interference:

    3 retweets 5 likes
    Undo
  19. 6 Jun 2019

    Join ’s and for the launch of cyber center as they present a new paper on securing American elections. Download the full paper and watch the livestream here:

    1 retweet 5 likes
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    6 Jun 2019

    Ahead of the 2020 election, Stanford experts urge a concerted, national response to confront foreign interference via

    6 replies 57 retweets 77 likes
    Undo

@Stanford_GDPi hasn't Tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·