-
Updated
May 18, 2020 - PHP
filesystem-library
Here are 68 public repositories matching this topic...
Talking about https://docs.pyfilesystem.org/en/latest/reference/walk.html#fs.walk.BoundWalker.dirs and maybe walk.files is affected as well.
The documentation talks about (emphasis by me):
dirs(path='/', **kwargs)
Walk a filesystem, yielding ABSOLUTE paths to directories.
and
filter_dirs (list, optional) – A list of patterns that will be used to match directori
It took me quite a while to discover this library. I was using "inotify" as search keyword on https://godoc.org/?q=inotify.
Consider adding it to the first paragraph of package-level godoc.
Great work and thanks for this library!
-
Updated
Apr 20, 2020 - Rust
-
Updated
Dec 30, 2019 - C
-
Updated
Apr 15, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Mar 27, 2017 - C++
-
Updated
May 4, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
May 20, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 11, 2019 - PHP
-
Updated
Jun 1, 2019 - Rust
When you call eg. "lscp" without specifiing device it does look in /proc/mounts for first nilfs device and use this. But i think it should not just take first device. It should check wheter the current working directory is inside a NILFS mount and use according device. Also it should work if i specify directory instead of device. eg. lscp /mnt/nilfs.
BTW there is nilfs2 plugin for thunar that
-
Updated
Sep 28, 2019 - Java
-
Updated
Apr 24, 2020 - CMake
-
Updated
May 29, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Oct 2, 2019 - Swift
-
Updated
May 1, 2019 - PHP
-
Updated
Feb 7, 2019 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 29, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
May 27, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Mar 13, 2019 - Go
-
Updated
May 6, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 16, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Apr 24, 2018 - Go
-
Updated
Dec 17, 2019 - C++
-
Updated
May 10, 2020 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the filesystem-library topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the filesystem-library topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
I was a bit confused about the "delete on close" semantics on Windows and did some experiments on it. The result indicates that Dokan's current API doesn't accurately reflect its semantics.
NtCreateFileon a file withDELETEpermission and with theFILE_DELETE_ON_CLOSEflag set (let's call ith1)h1g