Renee DiResta인증된 계정

@noUpside

disinformation, dystopia, discord

San Francisco, CA
가입일: 2009년 3월

트윗

@noUpside 님을 차단했습니다

정말로 이 트윗을 보시겠어요? 트윗을 봐도 @noUpside 님의 차단을 해제하지 않습니다

  1. 메인 트윗
    2018년 11월 28일

    My new essay on information war - “The Digital Maginot Line” - is up. It looks at how we’re still mistakenly treating global influence operations as disparate attacks,& how this may be pushing us toward digital security theater as we fumble for a solution

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  2. 55분 전

    He failed in SF. I don’t know why anyone would think this is a good idea for NY. Integration is an important goal. Eliminating gifted programs that benefit low income and middle class kids is the absolute wrong approach to get there.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  3. 57분 전

    This article is 🤯🤬. Carranza eliminated SF gifted programs. Know what didn’t happen? Integration. Then BoE weakened the math curriculum, eliminating 8th grade algebra. Then they said anyone who pushed back on that policy (electeds, parents) was racist.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  4. 9시간 전

    The fact that this needs to be made plain...one of those cultural divides between Wall Street and tech.

    취소
  5. 8월 26일

    NYT covers the well-meaning influencers sharing very old images.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  6. 8월 25일

    My version of the canonical tech-person-working-at-laptop shot has a ladybug water bottle in it. 🐞 The issue is great. I love what Offscreen is building.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  7. 8월 25일

    I did an interview with for the current issue (#21) and they came to my apt to take some photos of my IRL (offscreen!) life. My life is 90% the chaos that comes with 2 young kids, and the photos really captured that. 😂 I’m getting comfortable with chronic mess.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  8. 8월 24일

    Hyperpartisan echo chambers have already become divergent micro-consensus realities. Some people will never believe that the jerk they love to hate didn’t actually say that thing.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  9. 8월 24일

    Ironically, culture warriors who’ve spent years decrying journos as ”fake news” may now hope that same press writes articles debunking or decrying *actually fake* things. But it still might not matter.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  10. 8월 24일

    There have been recent articles suggesting deepfakes dont matter bc shallowfakes work just as well; there’s truth in that. But deepfakes will be fodder for the culture wars...audio passed off as a “secret recording exposed!” A number will hit the right outrage note and go viral.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  11. 8월 24일

    Just read Jordan Peterson’s blog post on deepfakes. I don’t agree with all of it, but he is right that anyone of any political persuasion who does public work, has a podcast, appears in a lot of videos is likely to be targeted and to potentially experience reputational harm.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  12. 8월 24일

    The 130k donors criteria is extremely easy to game. It’s a terrible way to decide who’s on a national debate stage. The poll criteria is the check against anyone rich using Tom Steyer’s ad strategy, and against outright fraud. It’s the legitimacy check.

    취소
  13. 8월 24일

    Just got carded buying nonalcoholic beer with 2 kids in tow.

    취소
  14. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    8월 23일

    Among the things Rep. Nunes is seeking in discovery for his lawsuit against Twitter - filed after a fake cow was mean to him online - is a list of every phone call Twitter employees placed "to somewhere in Virginia" during the past five years.

    취소
  15. 8월 23일

    I was reading the exceptional 's new book on my ✈️ home, and the cover and title (a🦄on the paperback) were so compelling that the man sitting next to me photographed it so he could buy it upon landing. :) Review here:

    취소
  16. 8월 23일

    There are layers to this onion: review manipulation tactics, FB groups for brokering paid reviews to get crap legitimized with ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️s, the recommendation engine and "you might like" emails, etc. It's remarkable Amazon doesn't get more attention.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  17. 8월 23일

    A huge % of this is Chinese sellers (marketing materials identical to their Alibaba listings.) Alibaba is perceived as cheap, bad customer experience, buyer beware. So these sellers are "Amazon-washing" their stuff leveraging AMZN's brand & distribution. Amazon has ignored it.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  18. 님이 리트윗했습니다
    8월 22일

    YouTube’s parent company Google just announced it has disabled 210 YouTube channels that were uploading videos about the ongoing protests in Hong Kong. The company said the channels were linked to the Chinese government.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  19. 8월 22일

    The monkey photo that's all over the hashtag...happy to report that apparently the baby monkey had just fainted. Photo was from India, 2016. What's actually happening in the Amazon? The hashtag is full of misinformation images.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  20. 8월 22일

    Same here. Images are real, but also not from Brazil.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소
  21. 8월 22일

    What is going on with this hashtag? Every single photo here is old, some several years old.

    이 스레드 보기
    취소

로딩하는데 시간이 지연되고 있습니다.

트위터의 트래픽이 폭주했거나 일시적인 문제가 발생했을 수 있습니다. 다시 시도하거나 트위터 상태 페이지를 방문하여 자세한 내용을 확인해 보세요.

    관심사 추천:

    ·