Rajiv Sethi

@rajivatbarnard

Economics | Barnard | Columbia | Santa Fe Institute | CORE

New York
Joined March 2011

Tweets

You blocked @rajivatbarnard

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @rajivatbarnard

  1. Pinned Tweet
    Mar 7

    A limited preview of my book with Dan O'Flaherty (out next month) is now available; the preface should give a sense of what the book is about:

    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    27 minutes ago

    Alan Krueger taught me a lot about pain. That people are in a lot of pain when they are unemployed, and searching for a job was their most painful part of the day. That men w/out work reported a lot of pain & took a lot of pain relievers. [1/3]

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. Retweeted
    8 hours ago

    We are all in shock. I can't imagine Princeton without Alan. I owe him so much, as my mentor, co-author, and colleague. I wish I had another chance to say thank you.

    Undo
  4. Retweeted
    Mar 14
    Replying to

    this is right, and it seems very related (although probably not exactly equivalent) to the argument formalized in this wonderful paper by

    Undo
  5. Retweeted
    Mar 12

    Introductory economics education should include a much bigger hands-on empirical component. I like what is doing. They could be the next "consensus" textbook for introductory econ.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. Retweeted
    Mar 12

    Next text for Harvard principles econ? suggests... us! "a more syncretic vision than the Olympian wisdom dispensed by Mankiw’s texts, and focusing more on hands-on data analysis [... has] the advantage of being free"

    Undo
  7. Mar 12

    Simpson's Paradox is also relevant for making sense of data on police use of lethal force

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. Mar 12

    Very nice, simple illustration here of Simpson's Paradox

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. Retweeted
    Mar 11

    I’m disappointed to see someone as smart as Renato to use the Manafort sentence as an opportunity to raise the old bugaboo of “sentencing disparities” caused by judicial sentencing discretion. It’s misleading, if not disingenuous. 1/

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. Retweeted
    Mar 7

    For context on Manafort’s 47 months in prison, my client yesterday was offered 36-72 months in prison for stealing $100 worth of quarters from a residential laundry room.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Mar 7

    Beatrice, brilliant as usual, with a beautiful thread on the mathematical turn in 20th c econ -- connections with debates in math, older ideas about physics-econ connections... Quotations still have a vividness & urgency today. Her X students lucky to get this course.

    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Mar 7

    Fall 19 list preview #3: Another jacket design ready. This for the great Branko MIlanovic and Capitalism, Alone, a provocative and wide-ranging account of, as it says on the label, the future of the system that rules the world.

    Undo
  13. Mar 7

    We have built a lot of experience with materials at and and would be happy to help; also working now on a US edition

    Undo
  14. Mar 6

    Just stop everything and watch this: Amazing Grace [Official Trailer] - In Theaters April 5, 2019

    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Mar 3
    Undo
  16. Feb 26

    This thread is a perfect example of how to explain a counterintuitive idea with clarity and without jargon, and provide empirical evidence in support of it, all without claiming more than the evidence will support

    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Feb 19

    The Department of Economics is pleased to announce that it will be taking part in Columbia University’s Bridge to Ph.D. program, to increase the participation of students from underrepresented groups in Ph.D. programs in STEM fields. Read more:

    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Feb 18

    Estimates of racial bias using police data are wrong if police discriminate in who they stop. New paper w/ , : analysis in Fryer (forthcoming) likely masks hundreds of thousands of instances of discriminatory police violence. 1/n

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Feb 15

    Yes people LOVE refunds. Average has been about $2700. That is a *choice*. The decision to reduce withholding to provide immediate but unnoticeable increases in take home pay was behaviorally uninformed. $10/week not noticed. $500 lower refund is.

    Undo
  20. Feb 16

    Stellar group, and interesting entry barrier: "Membership in the EfIP network is open to all academic economists. Members are appointed after nomination by an existing member and following the submission of a 10-page policy brief."

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·