Roan Kattouw

@catrope

Software engineer . Board member . Advisory committee member for . Views are my own.

San Francisco, CA, USA
Joined September 2009

Tweets

You blocked @catrope

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @catrope

  1. Pinned Tweet
    10 Feb 2019

    The RV parking ban in the Portola got some news coverage this week. But let's take a closer look at the disgusting rhetoric around vehicular homelessness, from neighbors and politicians alike. (THREAD) 

    Show this thread
    Undo
  2. Retweeted
    3 hours ago

    When an environmental law is routinely used to impede things like affordable infill housing, bus lanes, and bike lanes, and public transit projects, it's time to rethink it entirely.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. 6 hours ago

    San Francisco was not allowed to add any new bike lanes for YEARS in the late 2000s because they hadn't sufficiently proved that PAINTING BIKE LANES on city streets is not harmful to the environment

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. 6 hours ago

    This was 's SB288, and it was much more of a fight than it should have been given how modest and common-sense of a reform it was. The bill also extended the exemption for bike plans, after SF's bike plan got held up in court for four years

    Show this thread
    Undo
  5. 6 hours ago

    Back in transit land, last year transit advocates won an exemption from CEQA for converting existing roadway lanes to bus-only lanes or bike paths (clearly and unambiguously good for the environment!)... but only after watering down what it applies to, and only until 2023

    Show this thread
    Undo
  6. 6 hours ago

    With this baseline rule, CEQA is rigged to let highway expansions off the hook, and Caltrans is incentivized to build just enough new highways to cancel out the gains from other policies that reduce emissions from driving

    Show this thread
    Undo
  7. 6 hours ago

    Using present day emissions as the baseline rather than a "future without the project" counterfactual means that projected reductions in admissions from more fuel efficient & electric cars "cancel out" the increased emissions from the highway, so there's "no environmental impact"

    Show this thread
    Undo
  8. 6 hours ago

    Meanwhile, a project to widen Highway 1 near Santa Cruz openly admits in its environmental review document that it'll cause more driving, but they get to compare *future* emissions with the project to *current* emissions without the project.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  9. 6 hours ago

    The project to build a second train tunnel between San Francisco and Oakland says they're budgeting $1 billion just for environmental review. ONE BILLION DOLLARS, to prove that adding capacity to the most crowded train line in California is good for the environment

    Show this thread
    Undo
  10. 6 hours ago

    In California, under CEQA, transit projects have to painstakingly prove they won't harm the environment, but highway projects get to claim that future improvements in fuel economy and electric cars will offset the emissions from increased driving caused by the new highway

    Show this thread
    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Aug 15

    A thing you can do today in California for democracy is to send in your ballot against the recall of Governor Newsom by voting no on Question 1. Whatever you do about Question 2 -- and Ventresca is at least not fanatical or silly -- please vote no on Question 1.

    Undo
  12. Retweeted
    Aug 14

    Boy howdy am I having a lot of feelings about Afghanistan today I deployed there twice--once in 2008 and once in 2009-10 It was already obvious that the Taliban would sweep through the very instant we left And here we are today

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Retweeted

    Recalling Governor Newsom means electing a Ron DeSantis kind of Governor — with elimination of mask & vaccine mandates. No thanks. We don’t need the COVID death cult governing California. No on the Republican power grab recall.

    Undo
  14. Retweeted
    Aug 13

    This is both to build a better city now and a better planet later. Join me and many others Sunday morning.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Retweeted
    Aug 13

    Sitting in one of the newly-pedestrianized plazas in Meatpacking and no joke the past 4 groups who walked by were talking about how nice it is now. Begging electeds to understand that a car-free city isn’t something most people know to ask for, but they love it after it’s done

    Show this thread
    Undo
  16. Retweeted
    Aug 13

    You can have all the tenant & rent control protections securely in place but that won't matter if the demand for housing outpaces the supply of housing available. We need all three and to dismiss the building of new homes is a serious error to make.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  17. Retweeted
    Aug 12

    Claim: Deinstitutionalization caused our homelessness crisis, not a broken housing system Reality: Bull shit! Most patients were discharged from hospitals in the 1950s/1960s but widespread homelessness didn’t occur until the ’80s when housing affordability began to erode rapidly

    Show this thread
    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Aug 13

    I’ve been a vocal critic of Gavin Newsom, but I am voting HELL NO on the upcoming recall. This is a recall led by Republicans. There’s a real chance this recall could go through, and if it does, we’ll end up with someone much, much worse. Please be sure to vote!

    Undo
  19. Retweeted
    Aug 13

    Work-from-home is, at best, a *congestion* mitigation policy. Commute trips make up only 15-20% of all trips, but we notice them because they take place at the same time in the same place. As a GHG reduction policy, it's lacking. Short 🧵

    Show this thread
    Undo
  20. Retweeted
    Aug 12

    One of the Supervisors responsible for personally destroying the 2nd most popular park in SF wants to talk about parks now (Supervisor Chan is so concerned with holding city government accountable that she disabled replies on this tweet, lest anyone ask her to be accountable)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  21. Retweeted
    Aug 11

    Larry Elder called global warming a "crock." He said Roe v. Wade was one of the "worst decisions." He believes minimum wage should be $0, opposes family leave, rejected concept of gender discrimination, supported Trump. He could be Governor, if we don't vote NO on the recall.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·