# Documentation tests

`rustdoc` supports executing your documentation examples as tests. This makes sure
that examples within your documentation are up to date and working.

The basic idea is this:

```ignore
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// let x = 5;
/// ```
```

The triple backticks start and end code blocks. If this were in a file named `foo.rs`,
running `rustdoc --test foo.rs` will extract this example, and then run it as a test.

Please note that by default, if no language is set for the block code, `rustdoc`
assumes it is `Rust` code. So the following:

``````markdown
```rust
let x = 5;
```
``````

is strictly equivalent to:

``````markdown
```
let x = 5;
```
``````

There's some subtlety though! Read on for more details.

## Passing or failing a doctest

Like regular unit tests, regular doctests are considered to "pass"
if they compile and run without panicking.
So if you want to demonstrate that some computation gives a certain result,
the `assert!` family of macros works the same as other Rust code:

```rust
let foo = "foo";

assert_eq!(foo, "foo");
```

This way, if the computation ever returns something different,
the code panics and the doctest fails.

## Pre-processing examples

In the example above, you'll note something strange: there's no `main`
function! Forcing you to write `main` for every example, no matter how small,
adds friction. So `rustdoc` processes your examples slightly before
running them. Here's the full algorithm rustdoc uses to preprocess examples:

1. Some common `allow` attributes are inserted, including
   `unused_variables`, `unused_assignments`, `unused_mut`,
   `unused_attributes`, and `dead_code`. Small examples often trigger
   these lints.
2. Any attributes specified with `#![doc(test(attr(...)))]` are added.
3. Any leading `#![foo]` attributes are left intact as crate attributes.
4. If the example does not contain `extern crate`, and
   `#![doc(test(no_crate_inject))]` was not specified, then `extern crate
   <mycrate>;` is inserted (note the lack of `#[macro_use]`).
5. Finally, if the example does not contain `fn main`, the remainder of the
   text is wrapped in `fn main() { your_code }`.

For more about that caveat in rule 4, see "Documenting Macros" below.

## Hiding portions of the example

Sometimes, you need some setup code, or other things that would distract
from your example, but are important to make the tests work. Consider
an example block that looks like this:

```text
/// /// Some documentation.
/// # fn foo() {} // this function will be hidden
/// println!("Hello, World!");
```

It will render like this:

```rust
/// Some documentation.
# fn foo() {}
println!("Hello, World!");
```

Yes, that's right: you can add lines that start with `# `, and they will
be hidden from the output, but will be used when compiling your code. You
can use this to your advantage. In this case, documentation comments need
to apply to some kind of function, so if I want to show you just a
documentation comment, I need to add a little function definition below
it. At the same time, it's only there to satisfy the compiler, so hiding
it makes the example more clear. You can use this technique to explain
longer examples in detail, while still preserving the testability of your
documentation.

For example, imagine that we wanted to document this code:

```rust
let x = 5;
let y = 6;
println!("{}", x + y);
```

We might want the documentation to end up looking like this:

> First, we set `x` to five:
>
> ```rust
> let x = 5;
> # let y = 6;
> # println!("{}", x + y);
> ```
>
> Next, we set `y` to six:
>
> ```rust
> # let x = 5;
> let y = 6;
> # println!("{}", x + y);
> ```
>
> Finally, we print the sum of `x` and `y`:
>
> ```rust
> # let x = 5;
> # let y = 6;
> println!("{}", x + y);
> ```

To keep each code block testable, we want the whole program in each block, but
we don't want the reader to see every line every time.  Here's what we put in
our source code:

``````markdown
First, we set `x` to five:

```
let x = 5;
# let y = 6;
# println!("{}", x + y);
```

Next, we set `y` to six:

```
# let x = 5;
let y = 6;
# println!("{}", x + y);
```

Finally, we print the sum of `x` and `y`:

```
# let x = 5;
# let y = 6;
println!("{}", x + y);
```
``````

By repeating all parts of the example, you can ensure that your example still
compiles, while only showing the parts that are relevant to that part of your
explanation.

The `#`-hiding of lines can be prevented by using two consecutive hashes
`##`. This only needs to be done with the first `#` which would've
otherwise caused hiding. If we have a string literal like the following,
which has a line that starts with a `#`:

```rust
let s = "foo
## bar # baz";
```

We can document it by escaping the initial `#`:

```text
/// let s = "foo
/// ## bar # baz";
```


## Using `?` in doc tests

When writing an example, it is rarely useful to include a complete error
handling, as it would add significant amounts of boilerplate code. Instead, you
may want the following:

```ignore
/// ```
/// use std::io;
/// let mut input = String::new();
/// io::stdin().read_line(&mut input)?;
/// ```
```

The problem is that `?` returns a `Result<T, E>` and test functions don't
return anything, so this will give a mismatched types error.

You can get around this limitation by manually adding a `main` that returns
`Result<T, E>`, because `Result<T, E>` implements the `Termination` trait:

```ignore
/// A doc test using ?
///
/// ```
/// use std::io;
///
/// fn main() -> io::Result<()> {
///     let mut input = String::new();
///     io::stdin().read_line(&mut input)?;
///     Ok(())
/// }
/// ```
```

Together with the `# ` from the section above, you arrive at a solution that
appears to the reader as the initial idea but works with doc tests:

```ignore
/// ```
/// use std::io;
/// # fn main() -> io::Result<()> {
/// let mut input = String::new();
/// io::stdin().read_line(&mut input)?;
/// # Ok(())
/// # }
/// ```
```

As of version 1.34.0, one can also omit the `fn main()`, but you will have to
disambiguate the error type:

```ignore
/// ```
/// use std::io;
/// let mut input = String::new();
/// io::stdin().read_line(&mut input)?;
/// # Ok::<(), io::Error>(())
/// ```
```

This is an unfortunate consequence of the `?` operator adding an implicit
conversion, so type inference fails because the type is not unique. Please note
that you must write the `(())` in one sequence without intermediate whitespace
so that rustdoc understands you want an implicit `Result`-returning function.

## Documenting macros

Here’s an example of documenting a macro:

```rust
/// Panic with a given message unless an expression evaluates to true.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// # #[macro_use] extern crate foo;
/// # fn main() {
/// panic_unless!(1 + 1 == 2, “Math is broken.”);
/// # }
/// ```
///
/// ```should_panic
/// # #[macro_use] extern crate foo;
/// # fn main() {
/// panic_unless!(true == false, “I’m broken.”);
/// # }
/// ```
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! panic_unless {
    ($condition:expr, $($rest:expr),+) => ({ if ! $condition { panic!($($rest),+); } });
}
# fn main() {}
```

You’ll note three things: we need to add our own `extern crate` line, so that
we can add the `#[macro_use]` attribute. Second, we’ll need to add our own
`main()` as well (for reasons discussed above). Finally, a judicious use of
`#` to comment out those two things, so they don’t show up in the output.

## Attributes

There are a few annotations that are useful to help `rustdoc` do the right
thing when testing your code:

```rust
/// ```ignore
/// fn foo() {
/// ```
# fn foo() {}
```

The `ignore` directive tells Rust to ignore your code. This is almost never
what you want, as it's the most generic. Instead, consider annotating it
with `text` if it's not code, or using `#`s to get a working example that
only shows the part you care about.

```rust
/// ```should_panic
/// assert!(false);
/// ```
# fn foo() {}
```

`should_panic` tells `rustdoc` that the code should compile correctly, but
not actually pass as a test.

```rust
/// ```no_run
/// loop {
///     println!("Hello, world");
/// }
/// ```
# fn foo() {}
```

The `no_run` attribute will compile your code, but not run it. This is
important for examples such as "Here's how to retrieve a web page,"
which you would want to ensure compiles, but might be run in a test
environment that has no network access.

```text
/// ```compile_fail
/// let x = 5;
/// x += 2; // shouldn't compile!
/// ```
```

`compile_fail` tells `rustdoc` that the compilation should fail. If it
compiles, then the test will fail. However please note that code failing
with the current Rust release may work in a future release, as new features
are added.

```text
/// Only runs on the 2018 edition.
///
/// ```edition2018
/// let result: Result<i32, ParseIntError> = try {
///     "1".parse::<i32>()?
///         + "2".parse::<i32>()?
///         + "3".parse::<i32>()?
/// };
/// ```
```

`edition2018` tells `rustdoc` that the code sample should be compiled using
the 2018 edition of Rust. Similarly, you can specify `edition2015` to compile
the code with the 2015 edition.

## Syntax reference

The *exact* syntax for code blocks, including the edge cases, can be found
in the [Fenced Code Blocks](https://spec.commonmark.org/0.28/#fenced-code-blocks)
section of the CommonMark specification.

Rustdoc also accepts *indented* code blocks as an alternative to fenced
code blocks: instead of surrounding your code with three backticks, you
can indent each line by four or more spaces.

``````markdown
    let foo = "foo";
    assert_eq!(foo, "foo");
``````

These, too, are documented in the CommonMark specification, in the
[Indented Code Blocks](https://spec.commonmark.org/0.28/#indented-code-blocks)
section.

However, it's preferable to use fenced code blocks over indented code blocks.
Not only are fenced code blocks considered more idiomatic for Rust code,
but there is no way to use directives such as `ignore` or `should_panic` with
indented code blocks.

### Include items only when collecting doctests

Rustdoc's documentation tests can do some things that regular unit tests can't, so it can
sometimes be useful to extend your doctests with samples that wouldn't otherwise need to be in
documentation. To this end, Rustdoc allows you to have certain items only appear when it's
collecting doctests, so you can utilize doctest functionality without forcing the test to appear in
docs, or to find an arbitrary private item to include it on.

When compiling a crate for use in doctests (with `--test` option), rustdoc will set `cfg(doctest)`.
Note that they will still link against only the public items of your crate; if you need to test
private items, you need to write a unit test.

In this example, we're adding doctests that we know won't compile, to verify that our struct can
only take in valid data:

```rust
/// We have a struct here. Remember it doesn't accept negative numbers!
pub struct MyStruct(pub usize);

/// ```compile_fail
/// let x = my_crate::MyStruct(-5);
/// ```
#[cfg(doctest)]
pub struct MyStructOnlyTakesUsize;
```

Note that the struct `MyStructOnlyTakesUsize` here isn't actually part of your public crate
API. The use of `#[cfg(doctest)]` makes sure that this struct only exists while rustdoc is
collecting doctests. This means that its doctest is executed when `--test` is passed to rustdoc,
but is hidden from the public documentation.

Another possible use of `cfg(doctest)` is to test doctests that are included in your README file
without including it in your main documentation. For example, you could write this into your
`lib.rs` to test your README as part of your doctests:

```rust,ignore
#![feature(external_doc)]

#[doc(include="../README.md")]
#[cfg(doctest)]
pub struct ReadmeDoctests;
```

This will include your README as documentation on the hidden struct `ReadmeDoctests`, which will
then be tested alongside the rest of your doctests.
