Which lab is it that you're having issues with?
Lab: Docker for Java Developers

Description

When deploying Java applications in production one usually specifies the amount of memory available to the JVM (-Xmx) and other assorted configuration settings. Unfortunately, this is (usually) static configuration and therefore fixed in the container image. When specifying memory constraints

Expected behavior

The path defined for example in the tsconfig file of the web3-providers-http package is misleading and should get corrected if possible in a non-breaking manner.

Actual behavior

The defined path is web3-providers instead of web3-providers-http.

Steps to reproduce the behavior

1. Open a tsconfig file from one of the provider packag

this will very quickly get out of hand if we allow it, i realize we don't have principles written down anywhere but to date one of them has been that binaries 'just work' without having to do any configuration. currently a user must set FN_MAX_REQUEST_SIZE, FN_MAX_RESPONSE_SIZE -- neither of these should be required to run.

test case:

cd tests/fn-system-tests/
go test -v

this

Feature Request

Add more configuration options for storage (IPFS). Command line arguments, for example.

Summary

For example, I want to develop my apps using IPFS. But I do not need to use it online. For example, running with --offline flag.

There two main ways to make it:

• Creating a variable called args in config/storage.js that would store extra argumens for the IPFS i

Expected behavior
Example Voting Application builds

Actual behavior
gunicorn fails to build due to wrong Python version

Information
Happens every time I run command docker-compose up build

Windows cmd shell output :

Digest: sha256:a9d3631c5062a6759362dafae7192041f6c10d83a9632daaab02024ccdae906d
Status: Downloaded newer image for python:2.7-alpine
---> 037e005d160a
Step 2/7 : WORK

In the Kubernetes admin course, we mention CoreOS Tectonic, but it may soon be folded into OpenShift. The slides should be updated to clarify (and, while we're there, add a few other options).

This is in file slides/k8s/setup-selfhosted.md.

[Discussion in #446](https://github.com/jpetazzo/container.training/pull/446/files/3f40cc25a2f31e54a02d64e683deee1be9837e86#diff-2ffe1c2ff95f331d6a12f9ea

It would be nice to have a healthcheck without writing YAML file.
I'm starting minio service, and it has 2 routes k8s style Liveness and Readiness. More here https://docs.min.io/docs/minio-monitoring-guide.html

Is it make any sense to implement such a feature?

The README.md currently mentions how to do this using DNS, but could this process not be improved on by using Consul instead?

As already mentioned in the readme, DockerSwarm.rocks recommends Traefik and HTTPS. This install uses Consul as a key-value store for the SSL certificates, which means many/most of the Docker Swarm installs following that recipe will have C

Actual Behavior:

• What is the issue? *

for convenient way, we need help user to easily install crane by bash script.

• What is the expected behavior?

such as curl -sSL http://crane.shurenyun.com/install | bash

git-tar needs to clone with a unique path (including branch)

Expected Behaviour

git-tar should clone to a path like: /tmp/owner/repo/branch to avoid conflicts

Current Behaviour

It clones to:

func clone(pushEvent sdk.PushEvent) (string, error) {
	workDir := os.TempDir()
	destPath := path.Join(workDir, path.Join(pushEvent.Repository.Owner.Login, pushEvent.Repository.Nam

Create a simple example of creating instances, installing docker, setting up security groups, LB's, etc. with Terraform, ideally for digital ocean and AWS.

Some examples:
https://github.com/Praqma/terraform-aws-docker
https://github.com/mlabouardy/terraform-aws-labs/tree/master/docker-swarm-cluster

TODO: write up user story for this feature

This came up while reviewing #1734, adding Expires to de Digest method of pss/message.Message would work towards achieving this.

Hey, awesome project!

I already have configuration management to take care of my swarm setup and I don't need some of the applications like consul (I run a single host cluster) or matomo (not always needed).

So, I am wondering, is it possible to configure a "bare" installation of swarmlet that just assumes that the swarm is up and just has to manage the SSH connections and deploy the stacks

Would make sense to mention minimum requirements.

Node left the swarm.
pi@pi2swarm7:~/dev/spaceagency-funker $ docker network create --attachable -d overlay funker
unknown flag: --attachable
See 'docker network create --help'.
pi@pi2swarm7:~/dev/spaceagency-funker $ docker version
Client:
 Version:      1.12.3
 API version:  1.24
 Go version:   go1.6.3
 Git commit:   6b644ec
 Bui

Hi @JuniusLuo . Could you please publish Firecamp upgrade guide to the wiki? I'm running 0.9.6 and would like to upgrade to 1.0 but worrying about the correct procedure.

Why are you submitting this feature request
the REST requests GET[https://api.temporal.cloud//v2/account/key/ipfs/get]
returns
{
"code": 200,
"response": {
"key_ids": [
"QmY8Ho4JurCFM8E3sf7tHc7px6J8s3tw1QPbpczrKZrtfY",
"12D3KooWAY2D4azyxxiAYPPdEwnrZf4M1aa5RHtaDrJ5T3VqTdJb"
],
"key_names": [
"chaingrok-TestKey1",
"chaingrok-TestKey2"
]