(This is just a suggestion, with an example.)

I'd like us to define the following things more clearly, and document them better (on GitHub, the main website, Wiki, etc):

• define an "official" release
  • our definition of "done":
    • what is required before we consider the ISO itself "done"?
    • what documentation is always required?
    • which web pages must it be

Owners of monsters should be able to add a biography to their monsters

• Add contract updatebio action
• Add updater in demux
• Add UI in frontend
• Add API to view public profile like https://labs.eostitan.com/api/v1/account-profiles/all/friedgermuef

What steps will reproduce the issue?

1. Pets-Drop-Items: false | Pets-Are-Babies: true
2. Reload
3. Spawn Wither pet

What was supposed to happen?

Wither should be small (like normal) or at least shouldn't shoot things.

What happened?

Wither was an adult and shot things, damaging terrain and mobs.

What version of UltraCosmetics are you using?

2.5.7

What Sp

Adding here other lists that either were used to create the list of this repository, or for ideas for this project.

• Martina's list
• Hitchhacker's brain to the universe
• Rémi's list
• [neurolinks](https://brainhack101.github.io/neu

These should be translatable

• Skilltree name
  • skilltree..name
• Skilltree description
  • skilltree..description.
• LevelUp message:
  • skilltree..level.

Following on from #44, there's a number of things that should be improved.

Easy enough:

• more documentation
• downsampling on activity and attenuation image should be made default in ScatterSimulation
• enabling of FBP recons (for scanners without gaps)
• rename some classes to include the PET name (as wouldn't work for SPECT etc)
• add a simple test for ScatterEstimation
• don't har

This is in reference to #49

We're attempting to run the workflow on the tutorial data (to see how it compares to our data); however, the documentation for getting the test data seems to be geared towards the Donders Institute system (i.e. module add bidscoin). Is there another way for users to get access to the test data?

Thanks!

• be brave
• decide how to include GIFT in the library (variable in config file and environment variable for CLI)
• create a subcommand without many parameters in the neuro_pypes/cli/cli.py file
• make a list of all the parameters we can set for GIFT
• Add these parameters to the subcommand
  ... more to come?