Please describe the minimum necessary steps to reproduce this issue:

The example given in README for API some is not working as intended.
Link to example in REPL

const mm = require('micromatch');
// mm.some(list, patterns[, options]);

console.log(mm.some(['foo.js', 'bar.js'], ['*.js', '!foo.js']));
// true
console.log(mm.so

Recently I was working with another dev on some performance issues. At one point, i took the dbv++ output, pasted it into a blank email (to get the spacing formatted), then took that and pasted it into Excel. I then added a column for Elapsed time (this step) and added a formula to calculate for each line how much time had elapsed since the last log entry. A simple process, but kind of cumbersome.

After the release of Ruby 2.4.1, some blog posts about the absent operator were written, and they caused some discussions.

Blog posts:

• The New ‘Absent Operator’ in Ruby’s Regular Expressions – Ruby Inside – Medium
• [Ruby 2.4.1新機能: Onigmo正規表現の非包含演算子(?~ )をチェック](https://techracho.b

When hitting "Send Regex To Console" in the Output tab, the console shows something like the following:

pattern <- "\w+ " # perl=TRUE
replacement <- "NO "

Wouldn't be better to integrate the parameters into the actual function used? In this case, it could translate into:

sub(pattern = "\w+",
replacement = "NO ",
x = readr::read_file("LICENSE"),
perl

In favour of paste0()

Would it be possible to have the regex parser support character classes like \w within other character classes? I had a regex pattern earlier that used the character class [0-9a-zA-Z_\.-], and I attempted to simplify it with [\w\.\-]. I didn't notice this library doesn't support doing that, and was wondering just how difficult that would be to implement. For the time being i'm just expanding

https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/JSVerbalExpressions

Perhaps add a section to your readme clarifying how your lib is better than similar existing projects.