stan
Here are 207 public repositories matching this topic...
Summary:
Documentation of optimizing does not appear accurate, specifically the init parameter
Description:
The description of the init parameter of optimizing is identical to that of sampling, with reference to chains, which optimizing does not use (as far as I understand).
Behavior does not seem to correlate with choices of init either. For example, initializing
This should reduce the number of duplicated documentation snippets and replace @inheritParams tags.
-
Updated
May 18, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
Summary:
Right now there is a wiki page:
https://github.com/stan-dev/rstan/wiki/RStan-Mojave-Mac-OS-X-Prerequisite-Installation-Instructions
about a particular aspect of Mac OS X installation. Can we roll that into the basic install instructions?
https://github.com/stan-dev/rstan/wiki/RStan-Getting-Started
Otherwise, I fear people won't find it. Right now, there's a bunch of
It is not clear from the documentation what the intended usage is for outputs from stan_lm or stan_lm where you do not have hierarchies to pass to gather_draws() or spread_draws().
For example, fitting a very simple model with stan_lm():
library(tidyverse)
library(rstan)
library(rstanarm)
library(tidybayes)
test_stanlm <- stan_lm(mpg ~ cyl + disp + hp + drat + wt + vs +
Description
In the constrain_XXX functions applied to map unconstrained parameters to parameters in Stan, the value being constrained is required to be the same type as the log density target being incremented. These functions should allow the two types to vary independently. The target will always be at least double, whereas the variable being constrained might be int when used in t
-
Updated
Dec 3, 2019 - HTML
@bgoodri I just noticed that none of the CRAN versions of the vignettes have any output from the code chunk no output anymore (e.g. if you look at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rstanarm/vignettes/count.html
or any of the other vignettes). That is, it looks like none of the code is getting evaluated. I know that we're using that mechanism with params$EVAL to avoid evaluating the vignet
Just noticed that this isn’t discussed anywhere, but the PPC functions have always also been very useful for prior predictive checking, not just posterior checking.
-
Updated
Jun 23, 2020 - R
It would be helpful to have a NatsStreamingCluster example with all possible options just to see everything that is available.
For example in one of the examples it shows setting spec.config.storeDir. what other options are available here other than storeDir?
-
Updated
Apr 19, 2020 - R
-
Updated
Mar 22, 2019 - HTML
-
Updated
Jul 9, 2020 - R
-
Updated
Dec 2, 2018 - HTML
-
Updated
Jun 26, 2020 - Julia
-
Updated
Jul 6, 2020 - R
-
Updated
Mar 5, 2019 - MATLAB
-
Updated
May 6, 2020 - Stan
-
Updated
Nov 6, 2019 - TeX
数式 TeX 記法の統一
-
Updated
Jan 6, 2020 - MATLAB
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the stan topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the stan topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Summary:
Regarding the parameters of the dual averaging optimization for the stepsize in the warmup, all parameters can be set by the user except
mu. For certain models, the initial choice ofmucan result in a drastic drop of the stepsize for subsequent iterations. This might lead to extra computation time. Asmuis adjusted for each window of the mass matrix adjustment, this can in e