0xdaryl
Follow
Create your own GitHub profile
Sign up for your own profile on GitHub, the best place to host code, manage projects, and build software alongside 50 million developers.
Sign upPopular repositories
-
-
Forked from eclipse/omr
Cross platform components for building reliable, high performance language runtimes
C++
-
-
-
-
Forked from eclipse/openj9-omr
Eclipse OpenJ9's clone of the Eclipse OMR (https://github.com/eclipse/omr) project. PRs should be opened against the upstream OMR project whenever possible.
C++
996 contributions in the last year
Activity overview
Contribution activity
December 2020
Created 21 commits in 3 repositories
Created a pull request in eclipse/omr that received 2 comments
Fix invalid OMR format specifier on Win32
Signed-off-by: Daryl Maier maier@ca.ibm.com
+2
−2
•
2
comments
Reviewed 19 pull requests in 3 repositories
eclipse/openj9 9 pull requests
- Handle monitor enter/exit on value based instances (X86)
- Delay liveness analysis to post tree lowering
- (0.24.0) Change TR_ASSERT_FATAL into failCompilation call
- Keep splitPostGRA stores in right block for acmp fast path
- AArch64: Change -fpic to -fPIC
- Serialize runtime assumptions
- Update CCData usage for changes made in master
- Add ability to activate CH Table at an arbitrary point
- WIP: Stash the right number of arguments for invokehandle/invokedyhamic
eclipse/omr 9 pull requests
- Use portable formats from omrformatconsts.h
- Add preProcess stage to recognized call transformer
- AArch64: Enable profiling recompilation
- RISC-V: assorted changes for OpenJ9 JIT
- Intial contribution to OMR shared cache build system
- BenefitInliner phase 1/3: Basic classes for performing abstract interpretation
- RISC-V: implement `riscvCodeSync()`
- Reset on stack buffer pointer for iconv
- RISC-V: refactor instruction encoding macros
eclipse/openj9-omr 1 pull request
Created an issue in eclipse/openj9 that received 3 comments
Remove J9VM_JIT_NEW_INSTANCE_PROTOTYPE macro
Remove uses of the J9VM_JIT_NEW_INSTANCE_PROTOTYPE macro and fold associated code guarded with it assuming it is always defined.
Original question:
…
3
comments