Skip to content

Bug 1881060: don't wait for an OLM operator to succeed on non-amd64 #25550

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2020
Merged

Bug 1881060: don't wait for an OLM operator to succeed on non-amd64 #25550

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2020

Conversation

ecordell
Copy link
Contributor

until we have a good multi-arch operator available for test, skip the check that waits for an operator to succeed.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 24, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ecordell: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1881060, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

In response to this:

Bug 1881060: don't wait for an OLM operator to succeed on non-amd64

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 24, 2020
@ecordell
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

not sure that checking runtime arch will indicate the target cluster arch. depends on how non-amd64 arches are tested.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 24, 2020
@ecordell
don't wait for an OLM operator to succeed on non-amd64
d8ebfbe 
until we have a good multi-arch operator available for test
@ecordell ecordell force-pushed the skip-olm-check-non-amd64 branch from 051c1f0 to d8ebfbe Compare September 24, 2020 14:28
@ecordell
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 24, 2020
@exdx
Copy link
Contributor

exdx commented Sep 24, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 24, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Sep 24, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, ecordell, exdx

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 24, 2020
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Sep 24, 2020

You'll want to restore this on other platforms I think, but thanks for releasing ppc and 390

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ecordell
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 92c049a into openshift:master Sep 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ecordell: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1881060 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 1881060: don't wait for an OLM operator to succeed on non-amd64

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gabemontero gabemontero Awaiting requested review from gabemontero

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

Assignees

@exdx exdx

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@ecordell @openshift-ci-robot @exdx @deads2k @openshift-bot @openshift-merge-robot