Hi,

It seems like the HTTP Assert package does not allow me to specify a body to pass in a POST request for example. Looking at the HTTPBody() function, the body argument is set to nil:
req, err := http.NewRequest(method, url+"?"+values.Encode(), nil)

Is this by design, or am I looking at a missing feature?

Cheers,

Map.shouldContainAnyKeyOf(a,b,...) // contains one of more of the keys
Map.shouldContainAnyValueOf(a, b, ...) // contains one or more of the values

It would be nice to start building Pester on PowerShell 7 as well to see if it is compatible and keep it that way. To achieve that we need to research on which build servers v7 is already available. Right now we are building on TravisCI (Linux and MacOS), on AppVeyor (PowerShell 4+) and AzureDevOps (PowerShell 2&3).

Not sure if the build task needs to run on all three platforms, but it would be

Summary

ShouldContainOnly is used in a few places where we know what kind of elements we are dealing with, in this case instead of using the term element we could use a more descriptive name.

Example

Spliterator<?> actual = createSpliterator(SORTED | ORDERED);
spliterators.assertHasOnlyCharacteristics(INFO, actual, DISTINCT, SORTED);

fails with this error

Feature Request

Description:
API for Date matchers. Some matchers are inspired by Jasmine Matchers.

Possible solution:

Jasmine-like matchers:

expect(date).toBeDate(); // Matcher added
expect(date).toBeValidDate();  // Matcher added

expect(date).toBeAfter(otherDate); // Matcher added
expect(date).toBeBefore(otherDa

As a SDET
I want a documentation or Wiki page where the expected vs actual field matching is explained
So that I can use these in my test automation to test the server response payloads and headers
e.g. id=123 , id="123", isValid=true, isValid="true" etc

AC1:

Cover the following currently supported mechanisms with examples

• $EQ
• (int)
• (float) or (decimal)
• (boolean)

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Since dropping python 3.5 #142 the pandera code-base can now use f-string formatting for conciseness and ✨ elegance ✨

Describe the solution you'd like

• replace all instances of '%s' formatting with f"{}" string formatting

Normally, the "to be truthy" assertion does not take any value as it simply asserts that a subject can be coerced to a boolean true (in the case of "to be falsy" it is coercion to boolean false).

It seems that early on these assertions inherited an optional form where a custom message can be supplied as their argument - this was likely inspired by earlier assertions frameworks (assert on node

Platform (all, jvm, js, android): all
Extension (none, kotlin 1.3): none

Code related feature

expect(path).contains("test.txt", "dummy.log")

//instead of

expect(path).isDirectory() and {
  resolve("test.txt") { exists() }
  resolve("dummy.log") { exists() }
}

Following the things you need to do:

api-fluent

• provide a fun contains which expects `path: