Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a hypothesis test case with an expected failure #652

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 3, 2020
Merged

Conversation

thepabloaguilar
Copy link
Member

@thepabloaguilar thepabloaguilar commented Oct 2, 2020

Add a hypothesis test case with an expected failure

@sobolevn this is what are you expecting?

Checklist

  • I have double checked that there are no unrelated changes in this pull request (old patches, accidental config files, etc)

Related issues

Closes #630

@codecov
Copy link

@codecov codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #652 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #652   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           73        73           
  Lines         1767      1789   +22     
  Branches       124       126    +2     
=========================================
+ Hits          1767      1789   +22     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
returns/methods/cond.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
returns/pointfree/cond.py 100.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a0131c1...9eaa2f8. Read the comment docs.

returns/contrib/hypothesis/laws.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
returns/contrib/hypothesis/laws.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sobolevn
Copy link

@sobolevn sobolevn commented Oct 2, 2020

Thanks a lot for your work! Sorry, I was not clear enough with this task 😞

@sobolevn sobolevn merged commit 3a9ae69 into master Oct 3, 2020
7 checks passed
@sobolevn sobolevn deleted the issue-630 branch Oct 3, 2020
@sobolevn
Copy link

@sobolevn sobolevn commented Oct 3, 2020

🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants