Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: clarify experimental API elements in vm.md #35594

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 19, 2020
Merged

Conversation

Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Oct 11, 2020

Remove redundant "should not be considered stable" (it immediately
follows a clause saying that it is "experimental") and replace with a
more clear (to me, at least) statement that we don't recommend using the
feature in production.

Checklist

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added doc vm labels Oct 11, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

@Trott Trott commented Oct 13, 2020

Remove redundant "should not be considered stable" (it immediately
follows a clause saying that it is "experimental") and replace with a
more clear (to me, at least) statement that we don't recommend using the
feature in production.

PR-URL: nodejs#35594
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott Trott merged commit ce03a18 into nodejs:master Oct 19, 2020
26 checks passed
@Trott Trott deleted the vm-recommend branch Oct 19, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2020
Remove redundant "should not be considered stable" (it immediately
follows a clause saying that it is "experimental") and replace with a
more clear (to me, at least) statement that we don't recommend using the
feature in production.

PR-URL: #35594
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2020
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2020
Remove redundant "should not be considered stable" (it immediately
follows a clause saying that it is "experimental") and replace with a
more clear (to me, at least) statement that we don't recommend using the
feature in production.

PR-URL: #35594
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc vm
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants