Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upGitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
Windows CI/CD #111
Windows CI/CD #111
Conversation
Former-commit-id: 843fda5
…rmatting mip_test also with black Former-commit-id: 87abd0d
…rmatting mip_test also with black
Former-commit-id: 6beb8ff
Former-commit-id: d543d5f
Former-commit-id: 7d48127
Former-commit-id: 521c150
Former-commit-id: c69680d
Former-commit-id: 2f29b00
Former-commit-id: aad95bf
Former-commit-id: 4d0eab6
Former-commit-id: 3b045bb
Former-commit-id: 763a95a
Former-commit-id: faf69bb
Fixing merge...
| @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ | |||
| from typing import List, Tuple, Optional, Union, Dict, Any | |||
| import numbers | |||
| import mip | |||
| import numpy as np | |||
jurasofish
May 28, 2020
Contributor
already imported in the try except below, to make numpy optional
already imported in the try except below, to make numpy optional
h-g-s
May 29, 2020
Contributor
Yes, you can remove the numpy import in the beginning
Yes, you can remove the numpy import in the beginning
|
Good stuff, would it be worth getting rid of the appveyor testing if windows can be used with travis? |
Yes ! Appveyor takes longer to start tests. Only Travis would be easier to maintain. |
I was thinking of suggesting moving to it. Using github CI has the benefit that forks will automatically run tests - no need to configure travis. Has windows, linux, and mac, and it's unlimited for public repos. I've worked with it a bit, I can have a go at setting it up if you'd like? Should be a pretty easy switch given all the scripts and configs are already established for travis and appveyor. |
|
It would be great to have the tests in github itself. It seems that we can
even run longer tests. If you could do it would be great.
…On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 21:23, Michael Jurasovic ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes ! Appveyor takes longer to start tests. Only Travis would be easier to
maintain.
It seems that github now offers CI, but no idea on how to use it.
I was thinking of suggesting moving to it. Using github CI has the benefit
that forks will automatically run tests - no need to configure travis. Has
windows, linux, and mac, and it's unlimited for public repos.
I've worked with it a bit, I can have a go at setting it up if you'd like?
Should be a pretty easy switch given all the scripts and configs are
already established for travis and appveyor.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#111 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4VZORAUEE5WDBFF534L7DRT36BLANCNFSM4NNOLHIA>
.
--
=============================================================
Haroldo Gambini Santos
Computing Department
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto - UFOP
email: haroldo@ufop.edu.br
home/research page: www.decom.ufop.br/haroldo
It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely
the most important.
-- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "A Case of Identity"
|
|
This has gone a little stale - is there any chance of at the very least merging the regression test? Always good to have more diverse tests. |
|
|
I lost track of the advancements but I'd really appreciate python-mip to work in my case on Windows. What shall I do to quicken that? |
Here is a PR with Travis configured for Windows testing and 1 non-regression test of a particular case where Windows and MacOS crash
I'm not really interested in maintaining this non-regression test on the log run, it is there to investigate the issue.