New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
An endpoint without an "operationId" causes the failure of the tool
#174
opened Sep 2, 2020 by
kooli89
Breaking change false positive when changing readonly property from true to false...
#172
opened Jul 7, 2020 by
subbartt
An API with an array which has a default value of e.g. default: [ ] causes failure
#171
opened Jun 18, 2020 by
phillim1
TypeError issue reported by OAD in CI for azure-rest-api-specs repo
#134
opened Mar 30, 2019 by
veronicagg
Report application of "x-ms-client-name" for existing properties as breaking
#120
opened Jan 2, 2019 by
anuchandy
Leverage source map from autorest for the reporting to the line number
Enhancement
Node
Sprint-108
planned
#103
opened Oct 3, 2017 by
vishrutshah
[RULE 1041] AddedPropertyInResponse reports incorrect property
bug
planned
#100
opened Aug 17, 2017 by
sergey-shandar
[RULE 1041] AddedPropertyInResponse shoul suggest adding "readonly true"
Enhancement
planned
#99
opened Aug 15, 2017 by
sergey-shandar
[Rule 1017] Validate how x-ms-client-name affects the ReferenceRedirection mechanism
#98
opened Aug 15, 2017 by
vishrutshah
[Rule 1016] ConstantStatusHasChanged rule should account for x-ms-enum extension
planned
#97
opened Aug 15, 2017 by
vishrutshah
[Rule 1007] RemovedClientParameter rule should account for moved parameter
bug
planned
#96
opened Aug 15, 2017 by
vishrutshah
[Rule 1005] RemovedPath rule should account for deprecation mechanism when available
bug
planned
#95
opened Aug 15, 2017 by
vishrutshah
Adding "x-ms-long-running-operation": true is a breaking change
planned
#93
opened Aug 14, 2017 by
jhendrixMSFT
[Rule] Parameter names should take into account x-ms-client-name
Rule
planned
#92
opened Aug 14, 2017 by
vishrutshah
[Rule] enum values changes should take into account for x-ms-enum
Rule
planned
#91
opened Aug 14, 2017 by
vishrutshah
Previous Next
ProTip!
Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.