#
matchers
Here are 53 public repositories matching this topic...
Hamcrest for Kotlin
-
Updated
Oct 4, 2020 - Kotlin
Chain Jest matchers together to create one powerful assertion 🃏 ⛓
-
Updated
Jan 22, 2022 - JavaScript
Curried Type Testing library, and Test Matchers for Jest
testing
typescript
jasmine
jest
tdd
mutation-testing
bdd
assertions
property-based-testing
assert
matchers
expect
jasmine-matchers
property-testing
type-test
jest-matchers
test-matchers
-
Updated
Dec 31, 2021 - TypeScript
Argument matchers for unittest.mock
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - Python
A comprehensive set of matcher-based assertions for easier testing of Rust code
-
Updated
Mar 25, 2020 - Rust
Test-framework agnostic assertion and expectation library
-
Updated
Feb 22, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Feb 4, 2021 - Ruby
A simple Jest or Chai matcher to compare screenshots, using Applitools Eyes
-
Updated
Feb 11, 2022 - JavaScript
Matchers for pytest
-
Updated
Mar 1, 2022 - Python
The playwright-expect is an assertion library for TypeScript and JavaScript intended for use with a test runner such as Jest or Playwright Test.
-
Updated
Aug 18, 2021 - TypeScript
power + assert-match >:3
-
Updated
May 5, 2019 - JavaScript
An implementation of assertion matchers for testing. Similar to Hamcrest for Java
testing
c-sharp
csharp
dotnet
test
dotnetcore
assertions
matcher
tests
netcore
test-framework
unittest
dotnet-core
assert
matchers
corematchers
assertion-matchers
csharp-core
dotnet-test
-
Updated
Feb 18, 2018 - C#
Jest custom matchers for Luxon library
-
Updated
Feb 13, 2022 - TypeScript
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the matchers topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the matchers topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Our collection matchers
forAll,forNone,checkAlland others don't includeCharsequence. It's only a type issue, asCharSequence !is Collection<Char>The current workaround for this is turning your strings into lists via
toList:However, I do feel we should be able to just