To load dependencies withing a gem/app, require_relative should always be preferred to require

We should check for any instance of (send nil? require `{:__dir__ :__FILE__}) and raise an offense.

I can't event think of a single instance where require should be called with an interpolated string tbh

Affects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT

Rule: JUnitAssertionsShouldIncludeMessage

Description:

From pmd/pmd#2871 (comment)

Code Sample demonstrating the issue:

https://chunk.io/pmd/fc7db65b2c6a46eca4c9a0c3012482e2/diff/spring-framewo

Elm has the option to output errors as JSON (via a flag), and something like that is handy for writing tooling around it. I'm trying to integrate pytype into ALE and this would make it a lot easier.

This file is enormous. Also, breaking it up will make running tests faster since Gradle can run separate test classes in parallel.

Describe the bug
In the docs found here:
https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/plugins/index.html#complete-test-plugin-listing

B109 and B111 show a description instead of a plugin name. This looks inconsistent since all the other plugin names are listed. I believe this is a result of a recent change to remove these deprecated plugins.

To Reproduce

1. Navigate to https://bandit

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In a minified JS file, showing the "matched line" will basically mean the whole file is printed. This is pretty painful to navigate around. And since every match in the file is a new finding, the whole file is printed again and again.

Describe the solution you'd like
Ideally, I would like to only show the matched section (

• Larastan Version: 0.6.1
• --level used: 5

Description

In a project that follows DDD, there are usually multiple directories where migration files exist:

database/migrations/*
domains/<domain>/Database/Migrations/*

In these cases it is not possible to configure larastan to scan all the migrations, since the databaseMigrationsPath only accepts a string.

Is there any way to

How can i run findsecbugs rules in spotbugs?

Am i right?

./spotbugs -textui -pluginList /Users/xxx/Downloads/findsecbugs-plugin-1.11.0-SNAPSHOT.jar -home . -low -output ./aaa -progress -train ./bbb -sourcepath ~/Downloads/codez/test/My-Blog/ -debug -noClassOk -progress -auxclasspath ~/Downloads/codez/test/My-Blog/target/ -choosePlugins edu.umd.cs.findbugs.plugins.core

I wrote some of the code to do this in a branch https://github.com/python-security/pyt/compare/class_based_views, but since I'm working on other things and this feature seems cool and important I'm making this issue 👍

Let me know if you would like any help in implementing.

Rubberduck version information
Version 2.5.1.5557
OS: Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.14393.0, x64
Host Product: Microsoft Outlook x86
Host Version: 16.0.4266.1001
Host Executable: OUTLOOK.EXE

Description
The event procedures _Itemadd on some collections are marked as "Procedure not used"

To Reproduce
declare

Private WithEvents colCeka As Items
Private WithEvents colDraft