Code review is systematic examination (sometimes referred to as peer review) of computer source code. It is intended to find mistakes overlooked in software development, improving the overall quality of software. Reviews are done in various forms such as pair programming, informal walkthroughs, and formal inspections.
Especially in the light of #151 , it would be great if people could just re-generate the whole Id file.
It would be nice if diff-goto-source (C-c C-c) worked when this is invoked from github-review-forge-pr-at-point. All it needs to do is set the current directory to the git working tree in the diff-mode buffer. In many cases it does not matter too much whether the user has the "correct" branch is checked out - it just needs to be close.
Pull requests automation service. Merge your pull requests faster
Insert a public link to a Lucidchart diagram so team members can quickly understand an issue or pull request
Online IDE for GitHub
DO NOT MERGE – as a service
Code Review & Collaboration for Jupyter Notebooks
Automated code review for technical debt and test coverage
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
Automated code reviews
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request
Find accessibility issues in your pull requests
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
A Benchmarked Definition of Done for Code Quality with BetterCodeHub
Steps to Reproduce: