-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - HTML
Code quality
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
Here are 487 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
May 3, 2021 - Rust
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - OCaml
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - JavaScript
Affects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT
Rule: UselessOverridingMethod
Description:
Note: There seems to be a difference when having the class in the auxclasspath or not (typeresolution).
Code Sample demonstrating the issue:
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
May 3, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - Ruby
-
Updated
Apr 27, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Apr 11, 2021
And, ideally, a configurable list of annotations denoting generated source or AST structures.
See #105 for the kind of issue this seeks to avoid, and the limitations of this fix.
Rule request
Thesis
Report raise statements outside of except block
# bad
def smth():
raise
# good
def smth():
try:
...
except:
raiseReasoning
It causes runtime error:
>>> smth()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
F
-
Updated
Apr 2, 2021 - JavaScript
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
-
Updated
Apr 19, 2021 - Dockerfile
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Haskell
-
Updated
Jan 7, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2020 - Shell
let people add .json
Is it possible to add .json to .imgbotconfig? (.imgbotconfig.json) I’d like my syntax to be highlighted
Description
website still show released versions only up to 2.5.0. We need to add missing changelog in https://github.com/pdepend/pdepend/tree/master/src/site/rst/news or even better to find a way to synchronize them automatically from the changelog.md
let x = { default: 42}; // "default" is highlighted as keyword
undercover should create warnings on entire files that weren't required by specs and hence don't show up in the lcov output.
This can be done by changing logic starting from Undercover::Report#load_and_parse_file
-
Updated
May 4, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
Jun 25, 2019 - Vim script
Code quality apps
Codecov | Code Coverage
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request
Codacy
Automated code reviews to help developers ship better software, faster
Lucidchart Connector
Insert a public link to a Lucidchart diagram so team members can quickly understand an issue or pull request
Testspace.com
Integrated GitHub test solution for CI Results Dashboard, Reporting, Manual Test Case Management, and Exploratory
CodeFactor
Automated code review for GitHub
Semgrep
Code scanning at ludicrous speed. Find bugs, apply guardrails across your repos, and get feedback in PRs, Slack, or email
abaplint
ABAP quality assurance and static analysis
Better Code Hub
A Benchmarked Definition of Done for Code Quality with BetterCodeHub
TestQuality
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Datree
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
Code Inspector
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
DeepSource
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis
Coveralls
Ensure that new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Works with any CI service
Sider
Automatically analyze pull request against custom per-project rulesets and best practices
DeepScan
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive