Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

keep dependents in worker dependency if TS is still known #5034

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 23, 2021

Conversation

fjetter
Copy link
Member

@fjetter fjetter commented Jul 7, 2021

Unless the task is entirely forgotten by
the worker it is confusing behaviour if
the dependent or a task is removed
once it finished executing. if this
information is required a dedicated
dynamic attribute should be used like
waiters on the scheduler side

@fjetter fjetter force-pushed the worker_keep_dependents_static branch 2 times, most recently from ba626ff to c07b8ef Compare Jul 8, 2021
Unless the task is entirely forgotten by
the worker it is confusing behaviour if
the dependent or a task is removed
once it finished executing. if this
information is required a dedicated
dynamic attribute should be used like
waiters on the scheduler side
Copy link
Member Author

@fjetter fjetter left a comment

Merging since this has been sitting for 16 days without complaints. This will also be a requirement for #5103

@fjetter fjetter merged commit 1c3a510 into dask:main Jul 23, 2021
9 of 11 checks passed
@fjetter fjetter deleted the worker_keep_dependents_static branch Jul 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant