-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - OCaml
Code quality
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
Here are 506 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Aug 4, 2021 - Rust
-
Updated
Aug 8, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Aug 7, 2021 - OCaml
-
Updated
Jul 7, 2021 - JavaScript
Many repositories need to fix, so please help if you like.
If you could help, it would be helpful if you could comment before starting the work not to overlapping.
Fix example
Run exit command after lint.
echo '::group:: Running golangci-lint with reviewdog 🐶 ...'
goAffects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT
Rule: UselessOverridingMethod
Description:
Note: There seems to be a difference when having the class in the auxclasspath or not (typeresolution).
Code Sample demonstrating the issue:
-
Updated
Aug 8, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 30, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - Ruby
-
Updated
Aug 4, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jul 21, 2021
And, ideally, a configurable list of annotations denoting generated source or AST structures.
See #105 for the kind of issue this seeks to avoid, and the limitations of this fix.
What's wrong
If I run WPS on such code fragments, then the error WPS000 appears, although the code is correct.
Fragment №1:
number = int(input())
if number == 1:
print("1")
else:
if number == 2: print("2")Output №1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ilya/Desktop/venv-wps-15.2/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wemake_python_styleguide
-
Updated
Jul 2, 2021 - JavaScript
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
-
Updated
Aug 5, 2021 - Makefile
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Haskell
let people add .json
Is it possible to add .json to .imgbotconfig? (.imgbotconfig.json) I’d like my syntax to be highlighted
-
Updated
Jan 7, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jul 29, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2020 - Shell
let x = { default: 42}; // "default" is highlighted as keyword
-
Updated
Aug 1, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
Jul 28, 2021
undercover should create warnings on entire files that weren't required by specs and hence don't show up in the lcov output.
This can be done by changing logic starting from Undercover::Report#load_and_parse_file
Code quality apps
codebeat
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
TestQuality
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Codecov | Code Coverage
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request
CodeFactor
Automated code review for GitHub
Semgrep
Code scanning at ludicrous speed. Find bugs, apply guardrails across your repos, and get feedback in PRs, Slack, or email
CodeScene
A quality visualization tool to identify and prioritize technical debt and evaluate your organizational efficiency
Django Doctor
Improve the security, performance, and maintainability of your Django code
Testspace.com
Integrated GitHub test solution for CI Results Dashboard, Reporting, Manual Test Case Management, and Exploratory
Restyled.io
Restyle Pull Requests as they're opened
Datree
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
Sider
Automatically analyze pull request against custom per-project rulesets and best practices
DeepScan
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
Imgbot
A GitHub app that optimizes your images
DeepSource
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis
SoftaCheck
Static Analysis for your C/C++ Code & Doxygen Automatic Code Documentation Generation and Storage

We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive