Pinned issues
Known issue in v6: Uncomfortable error info of `Union` valida...
#216
opened Apr 4, 2021 by
yuhr
Open
Leave your opinion: `asReadonly` should only work in type level?
#240
opened Apr 25, 2021 by
yuhr
Open
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Leave your opinion:
asReadonly should only work in type level?
help wanted
#240
opened Apr 25, 2021 by
yuhr
Add predefined
Truthy, Falsy, and Nullish runtypes
enhancement
upstream matter
#228
opened Apr 19, 2021 by
yuhr
1 of 3
Generic way to set a name to a runtype
enhancement
good first issue
#210
opened Mar 30, 2021 by
yuhr
How to represent rest properties in
Record
enhancement
upstream matter
#201
opened Mar 26, 2021 by
petr-motejlek
Option for .guard() and .check() to detect abundant properties
enhancement
#169
opened Sep 4, 2020 by
Remirror-zz
Support Optional Parameters For Contracts
enhancement
good first issue
#163
opened Aug 30, 2020 by
sylvanaar
Previous Next
ProTip!
no:milestone will show everything without a milestone.