-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - OCaml
Code quality
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
Here are 509 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Aug 30, 2021 - Rust
-
Updated
Aug 31, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Aug 31, 2021 - OCaml
-
Updated
Aug 26, 2021 - JavaScript
Many repositories need to fix, so please help if you like.
If you could help, it would be helpful if you could comment before starting the work not to overlapping.
Fix example
Run exit command after lint.
echo '::group:: Running golangci-lint with reviewdog 🐶 ...'
goAffects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT
Rule: UselessOverridingMethod
Description:
Note: There seems to be a difference when having the class in the auxclasspath or not (typeresolution).
Code Sample demonstrating the issue:
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 26, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Aug 10, 2021 - Ruby
-
Updated
Aug 16, 2021
And, ideally, a configurable list of annotations denoting generated source or AST structures.
See #105 for the kind of issue this seeks to avoid, and the limitations of this fix.
Rule request
Thesis
Right now this code:
def _check_parent(self, node: ast.If) -> None:
parent = get_parent(node)
if parent is None:
return None
if isinstance(parent, _ELSE_NODES):
body = parent.body + parent.orelse
else:
body = getattr(paren-
Updated
Aug 15, 2021 - JavaScript
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
-
Updated
Aug 27, 2021 - Makefile
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Haskell
let people add .json
Is it possible to add .json to .imgbotconfig? (.imgbotconfig.json) I’d like my syntax to be highlighted
-
Updated
Jan 7, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jul 29, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jul 28, 2021
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - PHP
undercover should create warnings on entire files that weren't required by specs and hence don't show up in the lcov output.
This can be done by changing logic starting from Undercover::Report#load_and_parse_file
Code quality apps
Code Inspector
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
codebeat
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
DeepScan
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
Datree
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
abaplint
ABAP quality assurance and static analysis
DeepSource
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis
Code Climate
Automated code review for technical debt and test coverage
Coveralls
Ensure that new code is fully covered, and see coverage trends emerge. Works with any CI service
Django Doctor
Improve the security, performance, and maintainability of your Django code
CommitCheck
CommitCheck ensures your commit messages are consistent and contain all required information
SoftaCheck
Static Analysis for your C/C++ Code & Doxygen Automatic Code Documentation Generation and Storage
Semgrep
Code scanning at ludicrous speed. Find bugs, apply guardrails across your repos, and get feedback in PRs, Slack, or email
TestQuality
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Sider
Automatically analyze pull request against custom per-project rulesets and best practices
Testspace.com
Integrated GitHub test solution for CI Results Dashboard, Reporting, Manual Test Case Management, and Exploratory

We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive