Skip to content
#

infrastructure-as-code

Here are 1,199 public repositories matching this topic...

magoun
magoun commented Aug 20, 2021

It would be useful to have a way to list all fargate profiles associated with a fargate cluster. Currently there isn't a way to access the default profile created by the FargateCluster construct.

Use Case

My specific case is to allow new FargateCluster to create a default fargate profile, then fetch the pod execution role from that profile and reuse it later when adding further

infracost
xeger
xeger commented Aug 31, 2021

For most of my resources, most of the cost components have 0 usage. (Example: S3 bucket using standard storage, no Glacier, no infrequent/frequent access, etc).

When I have known 0 usage, I put a 0 in the YAML file; however, the Infracost output still displays these items with a cost of $0. It would be nice to skip these items (which have a quantity of 0) because they do not contribute at all t

ejohn20
ejohn20 commented Aug 19, 2021

Uploading the SARIF formatted output to the GH repo fails. It does not appear to be valid SARIF according to the parser. Using the github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v1 produces an error message with invalid data.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Create a GH Action with the following steps to run the checkov scan and generate a checkov.sarif results file:
- name
terrascan
adegoodyer
adegoodyer commented Aug 11, 2021
  • terrascan version: 1.9.0
  • terraform version: 1.0.1

Enhancement Request

Other security scanning tools (e.g. checkov and tfsec) have a --soft-fail flag or equivalent option that allows you to always exit with 0 status.

Extremely useful when running the tool without halting a pipeline for example.

I currently use a workaround, but something more concrete would be very desira

anguslees
anguslees commented Mar 21, 2018

Garbage collection works by listing everything with the gc-tag. In a busy cluster, we really want that filter to happen server-side and ideally using an index of some sort.

That means we should use a Kubernetes label, not an annotation.

I think this will require a two-step migration plan (write both but continue to read annotation; release; drop support for annotation; release).

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the infrastructure-as-code topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the infrastructure-as-code topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more