-
Updated
Sep 3, 2021 - Java
bpmn
Here are 411 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Sep 3, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Aug 6, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - JavaScript
Describe the bug
We have several commands which should return an empty response like:
- Fail job
- Complete job
- Cancel instance
- Resolve incident
- etc.
But instead of returning an object (which would be expected, since it is part of the interface) it is returning null.
The following fails:
val fai-
Updated
Sep 3, 2021 - Java
When I implemented an example project for bpmn-js that uses an additional module I was wondering about the array sytax which you are required to use in order to make it work. As a developer who doesn't know about the internal workings of bpmn-js it might be overwhelming having to use the array syntax for something as simple as providing a different translation function for i18n. At least this is w
-
Updated
Sep 3, 2021 - Python
What should we do?
We should track diagram open for forms in the modeler, including the selected engine profile.
Tasks
- Diagram open is tracked for forms similar to our other editors, including the engine profile (name, version), if set
- [Telemetry documentation](https://githu
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 11, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 26, 2019 - PHP
-
Updated
May 31, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 25, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 3, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Sep 1, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
May 12, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 17, 2021 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the bpmn topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the bpmn topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Describe the Bug
When adding a first participant/pool into the model, the ID of the process element does not change. If I undo this action, the participant gets removed and the ID of the process still stays the same as expected. However, when I redo this undo (re-add the participant), the id of the process is different this time.
Note: note sure if this is also a bug, but when I remove th