Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up lang_items::extract #92702

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 10, 2022
Merged

Conversation

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

@ehuss ehuss commented Jan 9, 2022

Noted in #87739 (review),
lang_items::extract no longer needs to take a closure.

Noted in rust-lang#87739 (review),
lang_items::extract no longer needs to take a closure.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

@rust-highfive rust-highfive commented Jan 9, 2022

r? @petrochenkov

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@petrochenkov petrochenkov commented Jan 10, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

@bors bors commented Jan 10, 2022

📌 Commit 2b75720 has been approved by petrochenkov

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2022
…askrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#92248 (Normalize struct tail type when checking Pointee trait)
 - rust-lang#92357 (Fix invalid removal of newlines from doc comments)
 - rust-lang#92602 (Make source links look cleaner)
 - rust-lang#92636 (Normalize generator-local types with unevaluated constants)
 - rust-lang#92693 (Release notes: add `Result::unwrap_{,err_}unchecked`)
 - rust-lang#92702 (Clean up lang_items::extract)
 - rust-lang#92717 (update miri)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6719e3e into rust-lang:master Jan 10, 2022
10 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.60.0 milestone Jan 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants