We already have some scripts in the scripts directory. It would be good to run them for every PR.
This is also a great task for beginners.

In our database projects we have several scmp-files with pre-configured schema compares.
As now I can use the files by opening the Schema Compare from the context-menu on the connection, and then click Open .scmp-file.

If I try to open the file from the file explorer or the project explorer I only get the underlaying XML-file, which mostly often isn't very useful.
It would be great to op

The current blue links are sometimes not easy to read, e.g. see the first screenshot from a user vs the second screenshot from my terminal (iTerm2):

![Screen Shot 2021-12-03 at 7 17 55 PM](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/638577/144636188-c01e185d-c4eb-4ad8-bfbc-0a8cd8b40fee

The https://github.com/nccgroup/ScoutSuite/blob/master/ScoutSuite/providers/gcp/rules/findings/iam-lack-of-service-account-key-rotation.json finding should only flag USER_MANAGED keys (https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/reference/rest/v1/projects.serviceAccounts.keys), as SYSTEM_MANAGED keys are "managed and rotated by Google"

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We're trying to switch our CI system from amd64 machines to arm64, to save money on AWS. We're running into a problem with our builds that use tfsec, because the docker image for tfsec is only published for amd64 architecture.

Describe the solution you'd like
If there was an arm64 version of the [tfsec docker image](https:

CKV_AWS_116 flags any Lambda without a dead-letter queue (DLQ) enabled. There's no explanation given for this recommendation:

https://docs.bridgecrew.io/docs/ensure-that-aws-lambda-function-is-configured-for-a-dead-letter-queue-dlq

AWS has retired it from their Foundational Security Best Practices controls on August 31, 2021:

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/securityhub/latest/userguide/securi

Summary

The Event Hubs client library aims to be mockable and fully support testability. To help illustrate usage of the new API for the testing scenarios, a set of samples mocking the various Event Hubs client types and illustrating use of the model factory is needed.

Scope of Work

• Implement a sample or set of samples demonstrating a basic approach for mocking the high level cli

I have a simple regression task (using a LightGBMRegressor) where I want to penalize negative predictions more than positive ones. Is there a way to achieve this with the default regression LightGBM objectives (see https://lightgbm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Parameters.html)? If not, is it somehow possible to define (many example for default LightGBM model) and pass a custom regression objective?

Description

When Remove-AzPolicyExemption is run with -Confirm:$false the cmdlet still ask for confirmation. This is not expected. In additional this cmdlet behaviors also differently than the other Policy cmdlets e.g Remove-AzPolicyAssignment.

If -Confirm:$false is specified the cmdlet should not ask for confirmation anymore.

Issue script & Debug output

N/A

Hi, I read example command here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cli/azure/container?view=azure-cli-latest#examples

and I found wrong command on "Create a container in a container group that runs Windows, with 2 cores and 3.5Gb of memory." Section.

Here your command
az container create -g MyResourceGroup --name myapp --image myimage:latest --ip-address public --ports 8081 --protocol UDP