proof-assistant
Here are 110 public repositories matching this topic...
A formula like forall x1. forall. x2. exists x3. phi gets resugared to, and hence pretty printed as, forall x1 x2 x3. phi. The bug is in the uncurry function in FStar.Syntax.Reguar.fs.
-
Updated
Mar 11, 2022 - Haskell
-
Updated
Mar 11, 2022 - HTML
-
Updated
Feb 24, 2022 - JavaScript
I won't have time to implement this, but it should be easy and it should provide a nice quality of life improvement.
Each goal buffer stars with a header line, like this:
1 focused subgoal
(shelved: 1) (ID 339)
width : Z
BW : Bitwidth width
…
It would be nice to move that info to the modeline, next to the buffer name (*goals*). We can change the "lighter" of the
-
Updated
Dec 28, 2021 - Emacs Lisp
-
Updated
Mar 11, 2022 - Coq
-
Updated
Jan 8, 2022
-
Updated
Aug 3, 2021 - Clojure
-
Updated
Nov 4, 2019 - Standard ML
-
Updated
Nov 29, 2021 - OCaml
-
Updated
Mar 6, 2022 - Coq
-
Updated
Feb 24, 2022 - OCaml
Eval cbn in 1 + 1.
Definition x :=
Eval cbn in 1 + 1.
Definition y := 2.The second Eval is not highlighted, and the second Definition is indented to match the second Eval.
-
Updated
Jul 12, 2018 - Haskell
-
Updated
Dec 15, 2021 - Coq
-
Updated
Jan 15, 2022 - OCaml
-
Updated
Oct 28, 2020 - Coq
-
Updated
Mar 9, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
Feb 27, 2022 - OCaml
-
Updated
Feb 16, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Feb 20, 2019 - Rust
-
Updated
Jul 12, 2021 - Scala
-
Updated
Sep 19, 2017 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2021 - OCaml
-
Updated
Sep 7, 2020 - Agda
-
Updated
Dec 11, 2021 - Haskell
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the proof-assistant topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the proof-assistant topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
Description of the problem
as discussed in Zulip the documentation of
DefinitionwithEvalis unsatisfactory. A user might more look underEvalorevalto find ways to do e