forecasting

make_future_dataframe doesn't support regressors currently. So code like:

m = Prophet()
m.add_regressor('var')
m.fit(df)
forecasts = m.predict(m.make_future_dataframe(periods=7))

gives an error like:

ValueError: Regressor 'var' missing from dataframe when attempting to generate forecasts

I know prophet may not know what exact values to put for var in each of the rows a

scipy 1.8.0 is just 2 minutes old and already breaks our CI/CD.

The issue seems to be with the import of _boxcox_conf_interval in BoxCoxtransformer which has changed.

Generally, it is a bad habit to interface private methods, we should not do this.

Also, it does not seem that the output of _boxcox_conf_interval is really used in the transformer? The easy way to address this is pro

The parameters of the likelihood model assume invalid values during training.

Description

(A clear and concise description of what the feature is.)

• util.cumsum implementation https://github.com/awslabs/gluon-ts/blob/master/src/gluonts/mx/util.py#L326 does not scale under mx.ndarray
• cumsum is 2-5 times slower than nd.cumsum under both mx.sym and mx.ndarray, and even fails for large 4-dim input

Sample test

Code

# import ...
def test_

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It would be nice to directly support simulating from a fitted ARIMA model, e.g. to have a simulate method to call that would delegate to statsmodels.tsa.arima.model.ARIMA.simulate. Right now, the only way I found is to use arima_res_ member of the fitted object.

Describe the solution you'd like

Class `pmdarima.arima.ar

We have a lot of antiquated docstrings that don't render well into ReadTheDocs. A kind of grunge (but incredibly useful) task would be to refactor these docstrings into proper ReadTheDocs format. This would allow us to render them effectively...

🐛 Bug Report

I ran code from How To Reproduce and got strange results: fold_info column in backtest's forecasts was not added to ts[:, segment] block but concatenated separately from other segment's columns.

Expected behavior

I expected smth like

|segment |     segment_0      |     segment_1      |      segment_2     |
------------------------------------------------------