parametric

This may be a good issue for someone wanting to eventually get deep into the geometry code of Solvespace.

issue:

Triangulating a NURBS surface is currently O(n^2) operation, and in many cases it doesn't produce very good triangles. We should be able to have better quality in O(n*log(n)) time.

background

For surfaces with compound curvature (a torus for example) we use "grid triangul

https://github.com/CadQuery/cadquery/blob/ab876acc84a7df273bb368549656912a980feae3/cadquery/cq.py#L1225-L1234

Needs to be updated to use the or string selector, fluent api, and remove the saveModel call.

and link to Github discussions Q&A.

The banner I threw together is terrible.

If you got any design chops please update this.

to allow broadcast features like:

setSolverParams!(fg, :graphinit, false)
setSolverParams!.(fg, [:drawtree, :showtree, :dbg, :treeinit], true)

this would be a partner to existing getSolverParams

When using the PortCutterRotated component, polar_coverage_angle attribute cannot be greater than 180 and a Standard_ConstructionError is raised.

This might be due to lines below:
https://github.com/ukaea/paramak/blob/7f5acbd65f904a1ccb527e061a3b7e3f86b8a26f/paramak/parametric_components/port_cutters.py#L151-L163

How to reproduce

from paramak import PortCutterRotated

With a large major radius relative to the minor radius, the blanket can form a strange shape and overlap with the TF coils.
Paramak_issue_large_major_radius.pptx