-
Updated
Mar 14, 2022 - Python
docstrings
Here are 62 public repositories matching this topic...
With Python 3.5.x having reached its end of life/support, we can begin to use "advanced" features from Python 3.6:
-
Updated
Jan 18, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 4, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 21, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Nov 16, 2021 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Jul 13, 2020 - Python
A common-ish mistake for docstring author is to use the label of a parameter as opposed to the actual name. The error message in this scenario could be improved. Right now the parameter docstring is reported as missing. It could be something like "Parameter label (X) is used instead of name (Y)".
-
Updated
Mar 4, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 15, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
May 28, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 3, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 3, 2017
-
Updated
Mar 7, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 9, 2018 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 4, 2022 - Emacs Lisp
-
Updated
Mar 16, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 4, 2022 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 15, 2018
-
Updated
Feb 28, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 5, 2022 - Python
The constructor should be documented at class level and not at the init function.
-
Updated
Jul 14, 2016 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 30, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 11, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 3, 2021 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the docstrings topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the docstrings topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
My problem
I document my class initialization inside the class docstring, therefore pydocstyle complains about undocumented
__init__methods.My solution idea
It would be great to have the ability to have a flag (for example
--ignore-func) that would work for both functions, classes and class methods with maybe a regex. So for ignoring the__init__the flag could be ``--ignore-fu