Many repositories need to fix, so please help if you like.

If you could help, it would be helpful if you could comment before starting the work not to overlapping.

Fix example

Run exit command after lint.

echo '::group:: Running golangci-lint with reviewdog 🐶 ...'
go

Expected Behavior of the rule

UnnecessaryAbstractClass should have a concise description like other rules

Context

I just updated Detekt 1.19.0 to 1.20.0 and got this failure:
https://github.com/TWiStErRob/net.twisterrob.cinema/security/code-scanning/227

The message is just plain weird to be this long:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2906988/164910306-4b4478c4-0

We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through track_files we give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).

That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive

Current problem

We sometimes see code like this:

def foo(*, left=None, right=None):
  """ ... """
  if (left is None) != (right is None):
    raise ValueError('Either both left= and right= need to be provided or none should.')

It is very easy to make the mistake of writing the check as:

def foo(*, left=None, right=None):
  """ ... """
  if left is No

Affects PMD Version:

6.45.0

Description:

UseCollectionIsEmptyRule fails with NPE if:

1. object under test is declared as re

Piranha transforms:

someConsumer.accept((x) -> { 
                                        if(exp.isTreated(STALE_FLAG)){
                                           doSomething(x);
                                        }
                                        else{
                                           domeSomethingElse(x);
                                        }
           

This bug: https://bugs.python.org/issue46175

We need to require super(cls, self) in this case.

I understand that optimisation of image/x-icon files has been added to Magick.NET (dlemstra/Magick.NET@c5e41c5). Are there any chances of this being added to Imgbot?

This has been requested before in #444, unfortunately, that issue has become stale without any comments whatsoever.