-
Updated
May 24, 2022 - Ruby
agent
Here are 1,022 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
May 24, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
May 24, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
Apr 13, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 9, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
May 19, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
May 13, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
Jan 21, 2022 - Java
-
Updated
May 1, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Feb 20, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Mar 4, 2022 - Python
newrelic_rpm.gemspec and infinite_tracing/newrelic-infinite_tracing.gemspec both start with git ls-files and then trim away unwanted content.
We don't appear to be trimming away enough.
For newrelic_rpm.gemspec, we shouldn't be including the files such as the following:
test/agent_helper.rbGuardfileDOCKER.md
For each .gemspec file, we should audit the list of
-
Updated
Feb 28, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jan 19, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
May 3, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
May 24, 2022 - Go
每Pipeline不能多个Sink的问题
每Pipeline实现多Sink存在的问题在于:
1 多Sink时,如何解决单个Sink写下游失败时的重试的问题?
2 多Sink时,如何解决不同Sink的不同拦截器配置的问题?业务侧可能会想要不同Sink下游的数据中有不同的Intercepter配置呢?
从代码看已经实现了 sink.Interceptor可以与Sink关联 这个特性。
是否借助这个特性其实就可以解决以上两个问题了?
问题1 的解法
retry interceptor 与特定的Sink关联,这样就可以在不同的Sink间做独立的重试。
此时比如2个Sink其中有一个的下游阻塞了,则重试行为是同一个pipeline的不同sink应该都阻塞。
Roadmap计划是做成这个效果吗?
问题2的解法
为不同的Sink指定不同的拦截器,这样就可以解决不同数据下游需要不同处理
-
Updated
Jun 7, 2018 - Python
-
Updated
May 26, 2016 - Lua
-
Updated
May 24, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Dec 21, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 22, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 15, 2019 - Java
-
Updated
Mar 27, 2022 - Pascal
-
Updated
May 12, 2019 - Go
-
Updated
Mar 18, 2018 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the agent topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the agent topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."
When class/field/member modifier groups are displayed, its a stack of colored shapes.
It would be useful to have on-hover capabilities for these groups to complain the flags enabled in each group.
See AccessFlags for the list of all flags.
It would be u