Scholarly Kitchen

@scholarlykitchn

The Scholarly Kitchen is an independent blog aimed to help fulfill the mission of the Society for Scholarly Publishing. All tweets via our Editor David Crotty

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
Joined March 2010
175 Photos and videos Photos and videos

Tweets

@scholarlykitchn is blocked

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @scholarlykitchn.

  1. 5 hours ago

    Hand of God paper retracted: PLOS ONE “could not stand by the pre-publication assessment”

    View summary Hide summary
    3 retweets 2 likes
  2. Retweeted
    10 hours ago

    University of Utah issues warning to faculty with regard to journal article sharing site Sci-Hub

    11 retweets 7 likes
  3. Retweeted
    17 hours ago

    I’m not sure spotting a howler in one PLOSone paper constitutes conclusive proof PPR scales to 10e6 papers per year ;-)

    6 retweets 6 likes
  4. 18 hours ago

    Painfully funny (and true): Let me Translate My Emails For You h/t

    5 retweets 1 like
  5. Retweeted
    Mar 3

    Errors riddled 2015 study showing replication crisis in psychology research, scientists say

    View summary Hide summary
    4 retweets
  6. 20 hours ago

    Gravitational Waves Explained

    View summary Hide summary
  7. Retweeted
    Mar 3

    Retracted: Even Devine Intervention could not save 's paper.

    4 retweets
  8. Retweeted
    Mar 2

    Let's look on the bright side. 's paper will have awesome and scores.

    11 retweets 13 likes
  9. Retweeted
    Mar 3

    Excellent article on the dangers to libraries posed by Sci-Hub

    8 retweets 2 likes
  10. Retweeted
    Mar 3

    Jonathan Glasspool: good academic publishers don't just publish in a discipline, they help create it

    12 retweets 5 likes
  11. Mar 3

    Richard Poynder: OA will remain a half-revolution

    3 retweets 2 likes
  12. Mar 3

    Free Legal Access to Most Articles

    View summary Hide summary
    1 retweet 2 likes
  13. Mar 3

    Is CC-BY really a problem or are we boxing shadows?

    2 retweets 2 likes
  14. Retweeted
    Mar 3

    In only a small number of cases, do PhD researchers w/o elite acad pedigrees end up in faculty jobs at Res. Univ.

    View summary Hide summary
    2 retweets 2 likes
  15. Retweeted
    Mar 3

    New development w. "creator" paper. Author claims mistranslation. Still, how did this pass review/editing?

    5:27 AM - 3 Mar 2016 · Details
    20 retweets 5 likes
  16. Mar 3

    Co-opting “Official” Channels through Infrastructures for Openness

    2:30 AM - 3 Mar 2016 · Details
    4 retweets 1 like
  17. Retweeted
    Mar 2

    I agree but still 1 case of 1000's. PLOS One's general problem = too big and quality control of AEs / reviewers suffers

    View conversation Hide conversation
    2 retweets 1 like
  18. Retweeted
    Mar 2

    It's a mystery how this paper got past PLOS' editor and reviewers.

    7:56 AM - 2 Mar 2016 · Details
    11 retweets 7 likes
  19. Retweeted
    Mar 2

    Plos One is now a joke. "....proper design of the Creator" absolute joke of a journal

    View summary Hide summary
    129 retweets 92 likes
  20. Mar 2

    Sci-Hub -- Tempest in a Teapot?

    View summary Hide summary
    4 retweets 1 like

@scholarlykitchn hasn't tweeted yet.

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·