Peter Suber

@petersuber

Working for to research. If you follow me for news, then also follow (). I aim for comprehensive coverage there, not here.

bit.ly/petersuber
Připojil se srpen 2009
230 fotek nebo videí Fotky a videa

tweety/tweetů

Zablokovali jste uživatele @petersuber.

Opravdu chcete tyto tweety zobrazit? Zobrazením tweetů nedojde k odblokování uživatele @petersuber.

  1. Připnutý tweet
    16. 4.

    1/ The Open Access Tracking Project (, ) is 13 years old today.

    1 reply 10 retweetů 25lajků
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  2. 6. 5.

    Excellent analysis by Kate Eichhorn.

    3lajky
    Vrátit
  3. 6. 5.

    New study: "We find that half of all [] report downloads are used for non-academic purposes, inc to improve…services by medical professionals, local & regional planners, public health workers, & veterans’ advocates, to name just a few."

    1 reply 1 retweet 13lajků
    Vrátit
  4. 6. 5.

    Update. "Articles from prestigious journals contained a higher percentage of potentially HARKed hypotheses… [&] were associated with more QRP [questionable research practices] than less prestigious journals."

    2lajky
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  5. 6. 5.

    "By all means, don’t extend copyright terms. Or, hey, even shorten them! But isn’t going to do that to one single company [] and he shouldn’t be allowed to do it at all on the basis of speech that he doesn’t like."

    5 retweetů 6lajků
    Vrátit
  6. Retweetnuto uživatelem
    6. 5.

    A must-read article by : 1⃣scholarly journal publishers don’t need exclusive rights & should stop demanding them 2⃣publishers could gain submissions by dropping the demand 3⃣authors should favor publishers who drop the demand & adopt open license

    I just published this. "Journal publishers don’t need exclusive rights. Or, they don’t need them for publishing. They don’t need them to make a work public or to add value…[or] to make enough money to pay their bills and grow."
    18 retweetů 30lajků
    Vrátit
  7. 5. 5.

    New study: "Platinum is growing faster than both academic publishing and [overall] OA publishing."

    1 reply 15 retweetů 34lajků
    Vrátit
  8. 5. 5.

    From report: "While many publishers offered expanded access to…content during the early months of the pandemic, these offers usually did not last for sufficient time for libraries to meaningfully integrate them into teaching & research activities."

    5 retweetů 9lajků
    Vrátit
  9. 4. 5.

    6/ Is there angry uncertainty about which side caused the leak? Or are the justices pretty much agreed on which side caused it?

    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  10. 4. 5.

    5/ Is it changing the procedure for moving from the first draft to the final vote?

    1 reply
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  11. 4. 5.

    4/ The Justices surely anticipated the public controversy. But now in a first, they've seen it in detail & before the final vote. Are they letting themselves discuss it? Take it into account without discussing it?

    1 reply 1 retweet
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  12. 4. 5.

    3/ Did it jack up pressure on Alito to revise his text? To drop or try to strengthen weak arguments? To prevent the loss of the majority? To protect his reputation with the general public?

    1 reply
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  13. 4. 5.

    2/ Did the May 2 draft-opinion leak reinforce the prior leanings of the other justices? Turn up the heat that breaks bonds and forges new alliances?

    1 reply
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  14. 4. 5.

    1/ I'd be interested in a new leak on the effect of the last leak.

    1 reply 3lajky
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  15. 4. 5.

    2/ Apart from that, interesting chart on growth of fee-based gold OA articles relative to non-OA articles, in chemistry over the last 10 years.

    1 retweet
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  16. 4. 5.

    1/ Another piece celebrating gold & misrepresenting green. Defines green as embargoed ("depending on the publisher"), lacking author rights, and not "true" OA. Completely overlooks how affects green (& about 15 yrs of history).

    6 replies 10 retweetů 24lajků
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Zobrazit toto vlákno
    Vrátit
  17. 3. 5.

    Adam Savage : * Not: "fear-based approach to invention, in which [we think] secrecy is the path to a big payday" * But: "Keep building on each others' work, keep iterating the old into new & keep making things better through collaboration."

    Vrátit
  18. 3. 5.

    New study: We want research to have social impact. But it's unfair to make social impact an expectation for young researchers (), since most media attention goes to senior male researchers in certain disciplines.

    1 retweet 2lajky
    Vrátit
  19. 3. 5.

    From : "Fierce competition for support has changed people's thinking from 'What problems am I interested in?' to 'What problems are likely to be funded?'"

    3 retweety 6lajků
    Vrátit
  20. 1. 5.

    Good analysis by .

    Perspective: “As the would-be new owner of Twitter, Elon Musk has been touting his passion for free speech over the past week. He’s also been showing his confusion, ignorance and utter lack of sophistication about how this prized concept really works.”
    1 lajk
    Vrátit
  21. 1. 5.

    TX Republicans (like FL Republicans) are reinterpreting free markets, limited government, and the public interest.

    1 retweet
    Vrátit

Uživatel @petersuber ještě neposlal žádný Tweet.

Načítání se zjevně nějak vleče.

Možná je překročena kapacita Twitteru nebo došlo k momentálnímu zablokování. Zkuste to znovu nebo se podívejte na stavovou stránku Twitteru, kde najdete další informace.

    Také by se vám mohlo líbit

    ·