Wiki Workshop 2019

@wikiworkshop

The annual Wiki Workshop will be hosted at 2019 in San Francisco on May 14, 2019. Sign up for updates. . Tweets by .

San Francisco, CA
Geregistreerd in januari 2016

Tweets

Je hebt @wikiworkshop geblokkeerd

Weet je zeker dat je deze Tweets wilt bekijken? @wikiworkshop wordt niet gedeblokkeerd door Tweets te bekijken.

  1. Vastgemaakte Tweet
    3 mei

    The program of with the full list of accepted papers is now available at: This thread highlights the main contributions. Looking forward to seeing you all in San Francisco!

    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  2. heeft geretweet
    17 uur geleden

    My trip report on the Wiki workshop 2019 from last week. If you have one too, let me know and I'll link to it.

    Ongedaan maken
  3. heeft geretweet
    17 mei
    Ongedaan maken
  4. heeft geretweet
    16 mei

    At the poster session of , 3 papers on wikimedia spaces, about: behavior of blocked community members; learning how to correct ; complexity, shape (including 🌺-shape) and popularity of Sparql queries!

    Ongedaan maken
  5. heeft geretweet
    16 mei

    If you are working on issues of inclusion, representation, information integrity and manipulation, check out these 3 white papers published with high-priority research directions to support free knowledge through 2030.

    Ongedaan maken
  6. heeft geretweet
    16 mei

    “Trajectories of blocked community members: Redemption, recidivism and departure”. Jonathan Chang and Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil breaking down the unintended consequences of user blocks on Wikipedia.

    , , en 2 anderen
    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  7. heeft geretweet
    15 mei

    By analyzing linguistic indicators (e.g., unfairness phrases), it’s possible to predict whether people are likely to make a repeat offense on Wikipedia.

    Ongedaan maken
  8. heeft geretweet
    15 mei

    “Citation Needed: A Taxonomy and Algorithmic Assessment of Wikipedia's Verifiability”. and presenting at . Full-text paper:

    Ongedaan maken
  9. heeft geretweet
    15 mei

    Can analysis of the interaction between Wikipedia editors identify controversial articles? Yesterday at the in the , San Francisco, DAIS PhD student shows how revision networks can combat misinformation online. Read more:

    Ongedaan maken
  10. heeft geretweet
    15 mei

    I will present our work on anomaly detection with application to Wikipedia, done with and , tomorrow Wednesday 16:24, session Web mining and content analysis II at ,

    Ongedaan maken
  11. heeft geretweet
    15 mei
    Als antwoord op en

    Here are the papers from talk at : (1) Hoaxes on Wikipedia: (2) Sockpuppets (multiple account abuse) in online discussions:

    Ongedaan maken
  12. heeft geretweet
    14 mei

    So excited by the work of my Cred labmate Khonzoda at on polarization on Wikipedia at presented at .

    Deze collectie tonen
    Ongedaan maken
  13. heeft geretweet
    15 mei

    I had the chance to present our work with at the . Great workshop with many interesting research topics. Thanks

    Ongedaan maken
  14. 15 mei

    “We also found that journal articles in chemistry referenced in Wikipedia typically see a 21% increase in citations compared to the rest of the chemistry literature.” —

    , , en 2 anderen
    Ongedaan maken
  15. 15 mei

    “Our experimental study found that the creation of new Wikipedia articles on scientific topics results in the corresponding literature to significantly becoming more similar to Wikipedia in the concepts it used than a control group.” —

    , , en 2 anderen
    Ongedaan maken
  16. 15 mei

    “Scientists may use Wikipedia, but they don’t cite it”. Embarrassment or no citation needed? —

    , , en 2 anderen
    Ongedaan maken
  17. 14 mei

    By some estimate we can say that there’s roughly one Wikipedia article on a scientific topic per 120 scholarly articles. —

    , , en 2 anderen
    Ongedaan maken
  18. 14 mei

    The last invited talk of the day: on how Wikipedia shapes science.

    Ongedaan maken
  19. heeft geretweet
    14 mei

    How good are humans are guessing whether a Wikipedia article is a hoax or not, by Jure Leskovec at Wiki Workshop

    Ongedaan maken
  20. 14 mei

    “We discovered undetected hoaxes, flagged them, and the Wikipedia editor community deleted them.” — at

    , , en 2 anderen
    Ongedaan maken
  21. 14 mei

    The number of links and their network properties are predictive of whether a Wikipedia article is a hoax. at

    , , en 2 anderen
    Ongedaan maken

Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.

Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.

    Je bent misschien ook geïnteresseerd in

    ·