OSI

@OSIUnited

The Open Scholarship Initiative (OSI) is a diverse, inclusive, global network of high level experts working together to develop the future of open scholarship.

Seattle, WA
osiglobal.org
Unit: abril de 2016
34 fotos i vídeos Fotos i videos

Tuits

Has blocat @OSIUnited

Estàs segur que vols veure aquests tuits? Això no desblocarà @OSIUnited.

  1. 9 d’abr.

    JIFs are bad for scholcomm, but researchers still love ‘em. Not surprising. Frustrating though. Maybe we need to come up with a sugar-free JIF—great taste, fewer calories.

    From et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expressed caution about [its] use....None of the RPT documents we analyzed heavily criticized the JIF or prohibited its use."
    1 resposta 1 retuit A 2 els agrada
    Desfés
  2. ha retuitat
    2 d’abr.

    Court orders publisher OMICS to pay U.S. gov't $50 million in suit alleging "unfair and deceptive practices"

    1 resposta 13 retuits A 11 els agrada
    Mostra el fil
    Mostra el fil
    Desfés
  3. 28 de març

    Fascinating---a must-read for all angst-ridden academics: WOS records "suggest that fewer than 10% of scientific articles are likely to remain uncited. But the true figure is probably even lower, because...uncited [articles] have actually been cited somewhere by someone."

    If I want to know how many papers remain uncited, would be the last source! The science that’s never been cited
    Desfés
  4. 28 de març

    Einstein, Planck, Curie, Bohr, Schrodinger, Rutherford, Thomson et al all wouldn't have qualified for this position in their early careers. Using publication metrics in RPT decisions is a problem that everyone recognizes. What to do about it is the $64k question.

    Spotted on a job advert. 🧐🤮😭 ping
    1 retuit A 3 els agrada
    Desfés
  5. ha retuitat
    25 de març

    "open access publishing accounts for over 40% of articles and was significantly associated with increased short-term citations": Open Access Publishing and Subsequent Citations Among Articles in Major Cardiovascular Journals

    8 retuits A 14 els agrada
    Desfés
  6. 14 de març

    A new edition of OSI's report on Plan S is ready for review at . This edition includes a section examining how Plan S deals with green open access. Thank you to those who recommended adding this section.

    2 retuits
    Desfés
  7. ha retuitat
    12 de març

    We shared this article on the list last week: . It speaks to the new normal in debate where we vilify people we disagree with. Of course, Jefferson and Hamilton debated this way too, but at least they produced tons of scholarship in the process.

    1 retuit A 1 li agrada
    Desfés
  8. ha retuitat
    12 de març

    By popular demand (or more accurately the unpopularity of tweets sent out under my work account ), I am thrilled to announce the launch of my new, destined to be immensely popular personal account. Expect 2-3 tweets per year, but they'll be really awesome.

    1 retuit A 11 els agrada
    Desfés
  9. 7 de març

    As if scholcomm didn't have enough problems already...

    “Universities require staff to publish several papers a year…If you bought your doctoral dissertation and struggle with teaching and administration loads, you will never be able to produce original research. But $15,000 will get you around that problem.”
    Desfés
  10. 7 de març

    Guest Post -- Leveling the Playing Field: How to Address Global Imbalances in Scholarly Communication via

    2 retuits A 1 li agrada
    Desfés
  11. ha retuitat
    7 de març

    Last week, the University of California terminated its license with Elsevier. Leakage has reduced the value of the big deal -- and publisher pricing power -- while empowering library negotiators, argues . via

    5 retuits A 5 els agrada
    Desfés
  12. ha retuitat
    12 d’oct. de 2018

    From our friends at . Paying for Open Access does not increase your paper's impact, but self-archiving in a repository does -

    11 retuits A 10 els agrada
    Desfés
  13. ha retuitat
    7 de març

    THREAD: What should we make of Swedish funder Riksbankens Jubileumsfond having second thoughts about Plan S? Should its decision to pull back be viewed as a brave move, or does it reflect badly on them?

    En resposta a @RickyPo
    Considering the national conversation, not surprising this happens in Sweden. Two thoughts: RJ is not a very big funder, so real effect apart from PR is relatively small; and second, this does not reflect well on RJ: if you are so unsure, don't sign in the first place.
    4 respostes 9 retuits A 3 els agrada
    Desfés
  14. ha retuitat
    5 de març
    En resposta a

    cc Note raw, unadulterated version here

    2 retuits A 3 els agrada
    Desfés
  15. 28 de febr.

    UC terminates subscriptions with Elsevier via

    Desfés
  16. ha retuitat
    20 de febr.

    NO SURPRISE: "Is Hybrid a Valid Pathway to Open Access? Publishers Argue Yes, in Response to Plan S" But hybrid only 'works' if we plough millions of extra £ into the system. View the UK over past 6 years. Hybrid is a pathway to profit.

    5 respostes 19 retuits A 42 els agrada
    Desfés
  17. ha retuitat
    19 de febr.

    Which future research scenario resonates most: 1) Brave open world 2) Tech titans or 3)Eastern ascendance?

    1 resposta 3 retuits A 9 els agrada
    Desfés
  18. ha retuitat
    19 de febr.

    Writing the final report for my fellowship. I asked at the beginning - why are libraries central to the ‘Open' agenda? Conclusion, and hard lesson - they aren’t. We are in and throughout, but not central. Researchers are the alpha and omega of Open.

    5 respostes 14 retuits A 82 els agrada
    Desfés
  19. ha retuitat
    19 de febr.

    "Only around 8% of referees chose to reveal their identity by signing their reports...Reviewers typically chose to disclose their names when their feedback on a manuscript was positive"

    11 retuits A 8 els agrada
    Desfés
  20. ha retuitat
    19 de febr.

    "By removing value from subscriptions over time, all hybrid models eventually give way to full open access. But this is not where Plan S incentives lead." via

    4 retuits A 1 li agrada
    Desfés

@OSIUnited encara no ha tuitat.

Sembla que triga molt a carregar-se.

És possible que el Twitter hagi assolit el límit de capacitat o que experimenti una sobrecàrrega momentània. Torna-ho a provar o vés a l'estat del Twitter si en vols obtenir més informació.

    També et pot interessar

    ·