OSI

@OSIUnited

The Open Scholarship Initiative (OSI) is a diverse, inclusive, global network of high level experts working together to develop the future of open scholarship.

Seattle, WA
osiglobal.org
Se unió en abril de 2016
34 fotos y videos Fotos y vídeos

Tweets

Bloqueaste a @OSIUnited

¿Estás seguro de que quieres ver estos Tweets? Ver los Tweets no desbloqueará a @OSIUnited

  1. 9 abr.

    JIFs are bad for scholcomm, but researchers still love ‘em. Not surprising. Frustrating though. Maybe we need to come up with a sugar-free JIF—great taste, fewer calories.

    From et al: "87% of institutions that mentioned the supported [its] use...while 13% of institutions expressed caution about [its] use....None of the RPT documents we analyzed heavily criticized the JIF or prohibited its use."
    1 respuesta 1 retweet 2 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  2. retwitteó
    2 abr.

    Court orders publisher OMICS to pay U.S. gov't $50 million in suit alleging "unfair and deceptive practices"

    1 respuesta 13 retweets 11 Me gusta
    Mostrar este hilo
    Mostrar este hilo
    Deshacer
  3. 28 mar.

    Fascinating---a must-read for all angst-ridden academics: WOS records "suggest that fewer than 10% of scientific articles are likely to remain uncited. But the true figure is probably even lower, because...uncited [articles] have actually been cited somewhere by someone."

    If I want to know how many papers remain uncited, would be the last source! The science that’s never been cited
    Deshacer
  4. 28 mar.

    Einstein, Planck, Curie, Bohr, Schrodinger, Rutherford, Thomson et al all wouldn't have qualified for this position in their early careers. Using publication metrics in RPT decisions is a problem that everyone recognizes. What to do about it is the $64k question.

    Spotted on a job advert. 🧐🤮😭 ping
    1 retweet 3 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  5. retwitteó
    25 mar.

    "open access publishing accounts for over 40% of articles and was significantly associated with increased short-term citations": Open Access Publishing and Subsequent Citations Among Articles in Major Cardiovascular Journals

    8 retweets 14 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  6. 14 mar.

    A new edition of OSI's report on Plan S is ready for review at . This edition includes a section examining how Plan S deals with green open access. Thank you to those who recommended adding this section.

    2 retweets
    Deshacer
  7. retwitteó
    12 mar.

    We shared this article on the list last week: . It speaks to the new normal in debate where we vilify people we disagree with. Of course, Jefferson and Hamilton debated this way too, but at least they produced tons of scholarship in the process.

    1 retweet 1 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  8. retwitteó
    12 mar.

    By popular demand (or more accurately the unpopularity of tweets sent out under my work account ), I am thrilled to announce the launch of my new, destined to be immensely popular personal account. Expect 2-3 tweets per year, but they'll be really awesome.

    1 retweet 11 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  9. 7 mar.

    As if scholcomm didn't have enough problems already...

    “Universities require staff to publish several papers a year…If you bought your doctoral dissertation and struggle with teaching and administration loads, you will never be able to produce original research. But $15,000 will get you around that problem.”
    Deshacer
  10. 7 mar.

    Guest Post -- Leveling the Playing Field: How to Address Global Imbalances in Scholarly Communication via

    2 retweets 1 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  11. retwitteó
    7 mar.

    Last week, the University of California terminated its license with Elsevier. Leakage has reduced the value of the big deal -- and publisher pricing power -- while empowering library negotiators, argues . via

    5 retweets 5 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  12. retwitteó
    12 oct. 2018

    From our friends at . Paying for Open Access does not increase your paper's impact, but self-archiving in a repository does -

    11 retweets 10 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  13. retwitteó
    7 mar.

    THREAD: What should we make of Swedish funder Riksbankens Jubileumsfond having second thoughts about Plan S? Should its decision to pull back be viewed as a brave move, or does it reflect badly on them?

    En respuesta a @RickyPo
    Considering the national conversation, not surprising this happens in Sweden. Two thoughts: RJ is not a very big funder, so real effect apart from PR is relatively small; and second, this does not reflect well on RJ: if you are so unsure, don't sign in the first place.
    4 respuestas 9 retweets 3 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  14. retwitteó
    5 mar.
    En respuesta a

    cc Note raw, unadulterated version here

    2 retweets 3 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  15. 28 feb.

    UC terminates subscriptions with Elsevier via

    Deshacer
  16. retwitteó
    20 feb.

    NO SURPRISE: "Is Hybrid a Valid Pathway to Open Access? Publishers Argue Yes, in Response to Plan S" But hybrid only 'works' if we plough millions of extra £ into the system. View the UK over past 6 years. Hybrid is a pathway to profit.

    5 respuestas 19 retweets 42 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  17. retwitteó
    19 feb.

    Which future research scenario resonates most: 1) Brave open world 2) Tech titans or 3)Eastern ascendance?

    1 respuesta 3 retweets 9 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  18. retwitteó
    19 feb.

    Writing the final report for my fellowship. I asked at the beginning - why are libraries central to the ‘Open' agenda? Conclusion, and hard lesson - they aren’t. We are in and throughout, but not central. Researchers are the alpha and omega of Open.

    5 respuestas 14 retweets 82 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  19. retwitteó
    19 feb.

    "Only around 8% of referees chose to reveal their identity by signing their reports...Reviewers typically chose to disclose their names when their feedback on a manuscript was positive"

    11 retweets 8 Me gusta
    Deshacer
  20. retwitteó
    19 feb.

    "By removing value from subscriptions over time, all hybrid models eventually give way to full open access. But this is not where Plan S incentives lead." via

    4 retweets 1 Me gusta
    Deshacer

@OSIUnited no ha twitteado todavía.

Parece que el contenido está tardando un poco en cargarse.

Puede que Twitter esté saturado o experimentando un problema momentáneo. Inténtalo de nuevo o visita el Estado de Twitter para más información.

    También te puede gustar

    ·